GerardM added a comment.
en-US is perfectly legitimate. The stuff about Alsatian is not.TASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T154589EMAIL PREFERENCEShttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/To: Lea_Lacroix_WMDE, GerardMCc: Jc86035, Liuxinyu970226, Jdforrester-WMF,
Jc86035 added a comment.
@Liuxinyu970226 I don't think so; GerardM didn't clearly indicate that, and presumably "similar situation" would refer to new wikis for macrolanguages, of which English isn't one.
The situation with en-us is different to the situation for Alemannic, and the granularity
Liuxinyu970226 added a comment.
@GerardM So this task should also be declined?TASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T154589EMAIL PREFERENCEShttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/To: Lea_Lacroix_WMDE, Liuxinyu970226Cc: Liuxinyu970226, Jdforrester-WMF, Psychoslave,
GerardM added a comment.
Hoi,
The Alsatian issues precedes the language policy and as such it is a "fait
accompli". We have to live with it. A similar situation will no longer come
into being because it will not be approved.
Thanks,
GerardMTASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T154589EMAIL
Psychoslave added a comment.
I replied to https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/2017_Community_Wishlist_Survey/Wikidata/Add_en-us_as_a_separate_language which is linking here as follow:
While I share the concern about the symptom, I'm not sure it's really a technical problem, but more an editorial one
