Oh I see what you mean. You want to go database--wikidata--wikipedia,
whereas I am going database--wikipedia--wikidata.
I think it is a good idea :)
-- Legoktm
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 1:22 AM, Bináris wikipo...@gmail.com wrote:
Lego,
nice work, but I am not sure whether we speak abpout the
There will soon be a mechanism where Wikipedia can display data from
Wikidata directly, as it currently does with the language links. No need to
bot-edit Wikipedia.
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 7:22 AM, Bináris wikipo...@gmail.com wrote:
Lego,
nice work, but I am not sure whether we speak abpout
Dear all,
It might be good to have in the meantime a javascript extension that
enables to show the wikidata in all wikipedia for WikiDataFans ?
Someone know how to do this quickly ? I'm willing to help debug if needed
Mohamed
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Magnus Manske
They're back.
Cheers,
Silke
Am 27.02.2013 18:32, schrieb Silke Meyer:
Hi!
Argh... Today the update of the demo servers failed on test-repo due a
puppet problem. The client thus doesn't work either. Sorry for that -
I'm trying to figure out why this happened to get the demo servers back
Sorry to be the contrarian, but I'm not sure we should be talking about
pulling data from Wikidata into Wikipedia until the devs announce that they
are close to deploying it. It makes no sense to build an infrastructure now
if the assumptions about functionality and API that you're basing the
Of course, I know what I speak about. Please let me think a few weeks in
advance. Yes, we definitely have to speak about the purpose of the project.
Tha basic question is of course how to transfer data from outer sources to
Wikidata properties, this is the only important point in the whole thread.
Inclusion syntax:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikidata/Notes/Inclusion_syntax
There will be a new code rollout on Wikidata March 6, which should bring
support for more data types. Not sure when the Wikipedia client support
will be installed, but can't be too far off.
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at
Thanks for the feedback. I think we will push forward and work directly on
wikidata. This is a conversion from database(s)-wikipedia to
database(s)-wikidata-wikipedia
All of our code will be and is open source. We'd be happy to share and to
build on what other bot developers are doing. Is
It is now public that first deployment of phase 2 client is scheduled to
end of this month in the same three Wikipedias that were the first to use
phase 1: hu, he and it. So it is definitely not some foggy future, and
worth to speak about.
--
Bináris
Heya folks :)
Here's your favorite weekly summary of all the good stuff that
happened around Wikidata during the last week.
The wiki version is at
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikidata/Status_updates/2013_03_01
= Development =
* Extended diff view to include references now
* Fixed bug where
2013/3/1 Jianyong Zhang zhjy...@gmail.com
I'm wondering how people handle such failure. Can it be fixed soon, or we
have to wait another 11-12 days for next dump?
Some people don't bother, some get angry or frustrated. It depends on your
personality and in my case on the time elpased since
We try to build a snapshot of wikidata.org. Thus we're depending on that
dump. Thus I actually care if it can be fixed earlier.
From http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Data_dumps, it mentions:
Failures in the dump process are generally dealt with by rerunning the
portion of the dump that failed.
12 matches
Mail list logo
