Oops. As of yesterday a template does exist.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Wikidata
From: hale.michael...@live.com
To: wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 15:49:11 -0400
Subject: Re: [Wikidata-l] The experience for (local project) editors,
post-Phase 2
We'll probabl
Heya folks :)
Here’s your summary of what happened around Wikidata over the last week.
The wiki version is at
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikidata/Status_updates/2013_03_29
= Development =
* The first 11 Wikipedias can now include data from Wikidata in their
articles: http://blog.wikimedia.de/
We'll probably also want a template for Wikidata like the one for Wikiquote,
etc. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Wikiquote I can go ahead and make it
if it doesn't already exist somewhere that I haven't found.
From: hale.michael...@live.com
To: wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Date: Fri, 29
I wrote on the wikEd developer's talk page and said I could help out if needed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Cacycle/wikEd#Inline_links_to_Wikidata_itemsThat
still wouldn't help first time editors that come across the syntax
unexpectedly though. We should make sure it is described on th
I didn't know about the VisualEditor initiative, but I use the wikEd gadget
that you can enable under your preferences for the English Wikipedia. It makes
links to images clickable while editing, among other things. If we could get a
similar experience to link to a Wikidata item that could be a
Steven Walling, 29/03/2013 19:39:
The thread is at:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)#Wikidata_phase_2_is_coming_soon
Doesn't seem to be en.wiki-related, so I'll reply here: "normal users"
are not able to edit infoboxes anyway, so Wikidata is the first step to
m
Hello all,
This is Asher's writeup of the jobqueue disruption that happened
yesterday afternoon Pacific time.
He's not on this list, so please keep him in the cc: if you want him to
see your message.
Greg
- Forwarded message from Asher Feldman -
> Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 11:27:13 -0700
Hey all,
I was going to just email Denny and Lydia about this question, but I am
like most editors and I'm lazy, so I preferred to post on my home project
Village Pump. ;-)
I have some concerns surrounding the user experience implications of Phase
2, especially if properties syntax starts getting
It would be nice to never have to do any additional validation on the client,
but in general I'm pretty sure it's impossible to specify server validation for
every type in advance. Let's assume I want to upload gene sequences. I could go
through the long process of waiting to get a new type appr
> parse it into a date on the client-side.
this is exactly why I do not want to do. we should validate inputs, not
(try to) parse outputs
2013/3/29 Michael Hale
> It doesn't hinder the expansion of Wikidata because the current types are
> flexible. Added types will improve performance and simp
It doesn't hinder the expansion of Wikidata because the current types are
flexible. Added types will improve performance and simplify client access for
some scenarios, but every scenario I can think of is possible with the
currently available types. If you have data that you would like to enter,
Contrats! Anyways, I still miss various data types to be available for
properties - unavailability of these greatly hinders the expansion of
wikidata database. Any plans on how fast new (and comprehensive) data types
will be introduced to wikidata.org?
2013/3/28 Daniel Kinzler
> On 28.03.2013 1
How will be the queries formatted? Do I understand it correctly that a
QueryConcept is a JSON object?
Have you considered using something more in line with the format of
action=query queries?
Though I guess what you need is much more complicated and trying to
fit it into the action=query model woul
13 matches
Mail list logo
