(since qualified statements are
currently not converted to direct :P47c statements).
--
Markus Kroetzsch
Faculty of Computer Science
Technische Universität Dresden
+49 351 463 38486
http://korrekt.org/
___
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l
On 20.03.2015 19:08, Markus Kroetzsch wrote:
...
Feedback (and other interesting queries) are welcome :-)
Here's another nice query:
Find all astronomical bodies on which Wikidata has some coordinates,
ordered by the number of coordinates that refer to them:
PREFIX : http
the official WMF service goes online.
Cheers,
Markus
--
Markus Kroetzsch
Faculty of Computer Science
Technische Universität Dresden
+49 351 463 38486
http://korrekt.org/
___
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https
Hi Stas,
Since the JSON dumps and EntityData exports are (largely) free of
errors, there is already code for fixing this problem. Maybe we could
just use this.
Cheers,
Markus
On 27.02.2015 01:06, Stas Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
It's that time of the year again when I am sending a reminder that
PM, Lukas Benedix
lukas.bene...@fu-berlin.de wrote:
I second this!
btw: what is the status of the problem with the missing dumps with
history? (latest available from November 2014)
Lukas
Am Do 26.02.2015 um 14:52 schrieb Markus Kroetzsch:
Hi,
It's that time of the year again when I am
/Special:EntityData/Q3261.json
The JSON in the JSON dumps is the same.
Cheers,
Markus
[1] https://github.com/wmde/WikibaseDataModelSerialization/issues/77
[2]
http://dumps.wikimedia.org/wikidatawiki/20150207/wikidatawiki-20150207-pages-meta-current.xml.bz2
--
Markus Kroetzsch
Faculty of Computer Science
://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikidata/Archive/Wikidata/historical).
Anyway, our discussion was about the role of RDF, not about a
comprehensive history of Wikidata. Nevertheless, be assured that if
anybody would contest the contributions of OmegaWiki, I will react in a
similar fashion.
Markus
--
Markus
Dear Gerard:
...
This is the essence of Wikidata. After that we can all complain about
the fallacies of Wikidata.. I have my pet pieves and it is not your RDF
SPARQL and stuff. That is mostly stuff for academics and it its use is
largely academic and not useful on the level where I want
automatically --
should we in all of this cases switch to offering a web service that
gives you the data if you really need?
So, +1 for auto-generated descriptions, but -1 for not having them in
the data anymore.
Cheers,
Markus
--
Markus Kroetzsch
Faculty of Computer Science
Technische
also
depends on whether we would omit descriptions in languages that can easily be
covered by language fallback (e.g. no separate descriptions in de-ch and de-at).
--
Markus Kroetzsch
Faculty of Computer Science
Technische Universität Dresden
+49 351 463 38486
http://korrekt.org
/miga/?props
--
Markus Kroetzsch
Faculty of Computer Science
Technische Universität Dresden
+49 351 463 38486
http://korrekt.org/
___
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
.
Suggestions for improvements and contributions on github are welcome.
Cheers,
Markus
[1] http://korrekt.org/page/Introducing_Wikidata_to_the_Linked_Data_Web
[2] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikidata_Toolkit
--
Markus Kroetzsch
Faculty of Computer Science
Technische Universität Dresden
+49 351
Hi,
I got interested in subclass of (P279) and instance of (P31) statements
recently. I was surprised by two things:
(1) There are quite a lot of subclass of statements: tenth of thousands.
(2) Many of them make a lot of sense, and (in particular) are not
(obvious) copies of Wikipedia
13 matches
Mail list logo
