Not contradictory, merely confusing :)
Whether you should, is the communities decision. I was merely mentioning
that I would be happy if there was a bit to do for humans still, because
they write better bug reports.
On the other hand, considering we already have over 100k items, it is
probably
On a final note, I would ask that the bots stop running at Q99900 and resume
once we're at Q11, as Denny did make a point to me in private that day
that I agree with, that it's great for the milestones in projects (and
Q10 is a big one) to be reached by humans and not bots. Donno if
Hey there. To those of you that are American, happy Thanksgiving! To those
of you that are not American, happy Why can't I reach any of the the
Americans today, and what's with all this talk of stuffing? day!.
So a while back when Denny gave a talk in Boston about Wikidata, he
mentioned that he
I'm getting contradictory messages from Wikidata staff then. I mean we
already knew that we *could*, the issue is whether or not we *should*.
Sven
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Lydia Pintscher
lydia.pintsc...@wikimedia.de wrote:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Sven Manguard
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Sven Manguard svenmangu...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm getting contradictory messages from Wikidata staff then. I mean we
already knew that we could, the issue is whether or not we should.
There is no technical reason at the moment to not run bots. Beyond
that it's not
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Lydia Pintscher
lydia.pintsc...@wikimedia.de wrote:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Sven Manguard svenmangu...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm getting contradictory messages from Wikidata staff then. I mean we
already knew that we could, the issue is whether or not
