Re: [Wikidata-l] [Labs-l] Yet another partial labs outage

2015-05-16 Thread Maarten Dammers

Hi Andrew,

Andrew Bogott schreef op 16-5-2015 om 6:31:
I did shut off one instance:  wikidata-wdq-mm.  I don't have a 
personal grudge, but it was gobbling CPU cycles and the system really 
needs a rest.  If loss of that instance is a disaster for anyone, 
contact me and I'll see if I can revive it and shut off ten or so 
other instances to make room.
With that you basically break the edit flow of most users on Wikidata, 
see 
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Project_chat#wdq.wmflabs.org.2Fapi . 
This is one of those tools that have silently become production.


Maarten


___
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l


Re: [Wikidata-l] Wikidata for Wiktionary

2015-05-16 Thread Daniel Kinzler
Am 15.05.2015 um 01:11 schrieb John Erling Blad:
 How do we go from a spelled form of a lexeme at Wiktionary and to an
 identifier on Wikidata? 

What do you mean by go to? And what do you mean by identifier on Wikidata -
Items, Lexemes, Senses, or Forms?

Generally, Wiktionary currently combines words with the same rendering from
different languages on a single page. So a single Wiktionary page would
correspond to several Lexeme entries on Wikidata, since Lexemes on wikidata
would be split per language.

I suppose a Lexeme-Entry could be linked back to the corresponding pages on the
various Wiktionaries, but I don't really see the value of that, and sitelinks
are currently not planned for Lexeme entries. It probably makes more sense for
the Wiktionary pages to explicitly reference the Wikidata-Lexeme that
corresponds to each language-section on the page.

 And how do we go from one Sense to another
 synonym Sense? Do we use statements? But then only the L-identifiers
 can be used, so we will link them at the Lexeme level..

Why can only L-Identifiers be used? Senses (and Forms) are entities and have
identifiers. They wouldn't have a wiki-page of their own, but that's not a
problem. The intention is that it's possible for one Sense to have a statement
referring directly to another Sense (of the same or a different Lexeme).

 Wiktionary is organized around homonyms while Wikipedia is organized
 around synonyms, especially across languages, and I think this
 difference creates some of the problems.

The Lexeme-Part of Wikidata (L-ids) would be separate from the Concept-part of
Wikidata (Q-ids). The Lexeme part is organized around homonyms (more precisely,
homographs in a single language). Each Lexeme can have several Senses modeled
as sub-entities, meaning that each Sense has its own set of Statements. Each
Sense can be linked to Senses of other Lexemes (explicit synonyms or
translations) and to Q-id concepts (implicit synonyms or translations) using
Statements.


-- 
Daniel Kinzler
Senior Software Developer

Wikimedia Deutschland
Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V.

___
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l


Re: [Wikidata-l] Wikidata for Wiktionary

2015-05-16 Thread John Erling Blad
Your description is pretty far from whats in the proposal right now.
The proposal is not clear at all, so I would say update it and
resubmit if for a new discussion.

On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Daniel Kinzler
daniel.kinz...@wikimedia.de wrote:
 Am 15.05.2015 um 01:11 schrieb John Erling Blad:
 How do we go from a spelled form of a lexeme at Wiktionary and to an
 identifier on Wikidata?

 What do you mean by go to? And what do you mean by identifier on Wikidata 
 -
 Items, Lexemes, Senses, or Forms?

 Generally, Wiktionary currently combines words with the same rendering from
 different languages on a single page. So a single Wiktionary page would
 correspond to several Lexeme entries on Wikidata, since Lexemes on wikidata
 would be split per language.

 I suppose a Lexeme-Entry could be linked back to the corresponding pages on 
 the
 various Wiktionaries, but I don't really see the value of that, and sitelinks
 are currently not planned for Lexeme entries. It probably makes more sense for
 the Wiktionary pages to explicitly reference the Wikidata-Lexeme that
 corresponds to each language-section on the page.

 And how do we go from one Sense to another
 synonym Sense? Do we use statements? But then only the L-identifiers
 can be used, so we will link them at the Lexeme level..

 Why can only L-Identifiers be used? Senses (and Forms) are entities and have
 identifiers. They wouldn't have a wiki-page of their own, but that's not a
 problem. The intention is that it's possible for one Sense to have a statement
 referring directly to another Sense (of the same or a different Lexeme).

 Wiktionary is organized around homonyms while Wikipedia is organized
 around synonyms, especially across languages, and I think this
 difference creates some of the problems.

 The Lexeme-Part of Wikidata (L-ids) would be separate from the Concept-part of
 Wikidata (Q-ids). The Lexeme part is organized around homonyms (more 
 precisely,
 homographs in a single language). Each Lexeme can have several Senses 
 modeled
 as sub-entities, meaning that each Sense has its own set of Statements. Each
 Sense can be linked to Senses of other Lexemes (explicit synonyms or
 translations) and to Q-id concepts (implicit synonyms or translations) using
 Statements.


 --
 Daniel Kinzler
 Senior Software Developer

 Wikimedia Deutschland
 Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V.

 ___
 Wikidata-l mailing list
 Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l

___
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l


Re: [Wikidata-l] [Labs-l] Yet another partial labs outage

2015-05-16 Thread Yuvi Panda
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 4:02 AM, Maarten Dammers maar...@mdammers.nl wrote:
 With that you basically break the edit flow of most users on Wikidata, see
 https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Project_chat#wdq.wmflabs.org.2Fapi .
 This is one of those tools that have silently become production.

Nope - wdq.wmflabs.org runs from wdq-mm-01.eqiad.wmflabs and
wdq-mm-02.eqiad.wmflabs. wikidata-wdq-mm is just the old instance,
currently unused (afaict)

-- 
Yuvi Panda T
http://yuvi.in/blog

___
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l