On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 3:37 AM, Jeroen De Dauw wrote:
> Hey,
>
>> > Good to know, up till now I thought wikibase was still a mediawiki
>> > extension :s
>>
>> It is. But it consists of several components by now, some of which are
>> independent of MediaWiki.
>
>
> I don't agree with that use of th
Hoi,
I am really interested how you envision searching when all those topics are
isolated and attached to each file..
I also am really interested to know when you have all those files isolated
on Commons, how you will include media files that are NOT on Commons.. This
is a normal use case.
Thanks,
Hey,
> Good to know, up till now I thought wikibase was still a mediawiki
> extension :s
>
> It is. But it consists of several components by now, some of which are
> independent of MediaWiki.
>
I don't agree with that use of the terminology. The website defines it as
follows: "Wikibase is a colle
[X-posted announcement]
Hello,
The Language Engineering team of the Wikimedia Foundation has been working
on a tool for easy translation of Wikipedia articles from one language to
another. The Content Translation tool has been in development since early
2014 and in July it was deployed and opened
Am 04.09.2014 18:42, schrieb Deryck Chan:
> Good to know, up till now I thought wikibase was still a mediawiki extension
> :s
It is. But it consists of several components by now, some of which are
independent of MediaWiki. Ideally, we would eventually have a Wikibase core that
does not rely on Me
Good to know, up till now I thought wikibase was still a mediawiki
extension :s
On 4 September 2014 15:16, Jeroen De Dauw wrote:
> Hey,
>
> > Just wondering - why isn't this part of mediawiki.org?
>
> Most of the Wikibase components have nothing to do with MediaWiki. Having
> it on MediaWiki.or
Site looks great and responsive on smart devices too. :)
- Enock
On Sep 4, 2014 2:17 PM, "Jeroen De Dauw" wrote:
> Hey,
>
> > Just wondering - why isn't this part of mediawiki.org?
>
> Most of the Wikibase components have nothing to do with MediaWiki. Having
> it on MediaWiki.org would make the
Hey,
> Just wondering - why isn't this part of mediawiki.org?
Most of the Wikibase components have nothing to do with MediaWiki. Having
it on MediaWiki.org would make the whole software appear to be MediaWiki
specific, and thus scare non-MediaWiki users away. Furthermore, it's sub
optimal to have
Just wondering - why isn't this part of mediawiki.org?
On 2 September 2014 19:03, Jeroen De Dauw wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Wikibase, the software created for the Wikidata project, now has it's own
> website. http://wikiba.se/
>
> Among the goals of the website are promoting third party usage and
> outl
Hoi,
I do not know if you were present at the recent chat, I could not be there
but I could read the log ... You may have been at the chat, you may have
read the log [1].
I did read the log and it did not motivate me at all. If anything it made
me sad. From what I read, people were concerned about
10 matches
Mail list logo