I found out the other day that there's an item about myself, and I wanted
to edit it, and got a weird feeling about it. So I raised the question on
the project chat
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Project_chat#COI_and_editing
and got told that an RFC would be a good idea. So I tried one. I
ja...@j1w.xyz, 30/12/2014 22:04:
Are there processes in place to manage the integrity of
these structural components of Wikidata?
Yes.
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Database_reports/Constraint_violations
Nemo
___
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wik
Having followed Freebase and the announcement about migrating to
Wikidata, I'm trying to get up to speed on the structure of Wikidata. I
read on the site that relationships such as subclass-of and instance-of
are managed by everyone. Looking at automobile (Q1420) I see that it is
both subclass-of
Hoi,
The Wikipedia article on the subject has probably most if not all relevant
details..
Thanks,
GerardM
On 30 December 2014 at 16:39, Gerard Meijssen
wrote:
> Hoi,
> The most important people, as far as Wikidata is concerned, are the
> Wikidata developers. As long as they indicate that t
Hoi,
The most important people, as far as Wikidata is concerned, are the
Wikidata developers. As long as they indicate that the software conforms to
the standard we are good.
There is no problem in them having the standard and publishing what is
expected of the use of timestamps and time diffs/
Th
At this step queries are planned
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Development_plan I guess placeholder
articles are lower in Lydia's list, this seems only a preliminar steps.
So it's not stupid to assume they will be ready.
I read your blog a long time, including your posts about reasonat
Hoi,
Until Wikidata provides query functionality, any arguments about it are
without much merit. Until that time WDQ provides functionality. That
functionality can be implemented in new functionality when it arrives.
As to the question if I know Reasonator ... Read my blog ... [1]
Thanks,
Ger
I would suggest you are thinking from the wrong perspective. Think
specific, and work your way from there. On the English Wikipedia, there are
tons of lists which each have their own set of rules for list items. This
makes a specific query much easier, tied to the list item on Wikidata. For
example
> Do you speak for the community ??
Nope, I speak for myself. Nether told anything else.
> Do you really know what Reasonator is about ?
I don't really appreciate the tone, I think reasonator is really cool and
I'm probably one of the people who pushed its use the most in Wikidata. Do
you have a
Hi, I got an open question about Wikidata concepts, partly related to the
idea of selecting a templates wrt. a query for placeholder articles.
One question about this idea is : what to do when several templates are
possible for an item, for example the item with no article is in the result
set of
Hoi,
One of the requisites as mentioned on the page by Lydia is that it is
usable on any and all projects. Relying on local only technoloy like
templates do not make sense.
Reasonator DOES provide functionality that is similar to what can be
achieved with templating. When a person has relatives, f
Hi Gerard, I like Reasonator a lot, but there is several advantages to an
integrated solution :
* We can reuse technologies of the mediawiki ecosystem, like for example a
very important one : templates, that are already used an that a lot of
wikimedians knows. It can be used to build template artic
Hoi,
You also forget that it HAS been in use on several Wikipedias in the past.
So when that was no problem why is it a problem that can not be overcome
now and for now?
Thanks,
GerardM
On 30 December 2014 at 12:15, Gerard Meijssen
wrote:
> Hoi,
> They are mostly excuses. The software has b
Hoi,
They are mostly excuses. The software has been in use for a LONG time. It
is known for its relevance for the same long time.. So the value of this
need is diminished by the lack of attention in the past.
The point is that these excuses are very much in the way of us achieving
our goal.. shari
Hi,
> Wiadomość napisana przez Gerard Meijssen w dniu
> 30 gru 2014, o godz. 10:24:
>
> Reasonator works now.
Yes, but the thing is that putting anything on production is not just including
it there.
The whole code needs to be reviewed and there are some limitations, especially
with 3rd part
Hoi,
Our aim is to "share in the sum of all knowledge". While building on top of
what Reasonator offers makes sense, Reasonator works now.
So yes, do have a look at what it is missing and what could be improved but
do not let that notion prevent us from sharing in the sum of all knowledge
that is
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Gerard Meijssen
wrote:
> Hoi,
> With all due respect. We have something that works already in Reasonator. It
> covers most if not all requirements that we can possibly think of. We have
> gained a lot of experience in that way.. Why not implement it and improve on
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Daniel Kinzler
wrote:
> The problem is that we don't really know what topic the user is looking for,
> we
> just know a term (the search string or page title). The easiest thin to do
> would
> be to show an automatic disambiguation page, listing items that have
Hoi,
With all due respect. We have something that works already in Reasonator.
It covers most if not all requirements that we can possibly think of. We
have gained a lot of experience in that way.. Why not implement it and
improve on it conform any potential additional requirements ?
Thanks,
G
19 matches
Mail list logo
