Re: [Wikidata-l] DBpedia usage in the bbc - selected highlights
___
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Gregor Hagedorn g.m.haged...@gmail.comwrote:
In my observation, numeric-URI-based systems like Drupal tend to have
minimal Links inside their content pages (i.e. beyond the menu
system), mediawiki-based system tend to have hundreds of links inside
their
I don't mean to spin this out into a tangent about Drupal.
Me neither, my discussion point here is: There are advantages for
opaque (like http:something.org/node123456) and nonopaque
(http:something.org/Bonn,_Northrhine-Westfalia,_Germany) URI/IRI
identifiers.
In the light of the use-case of
Yes, we are planning to do both in parallel, as this page explains:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikidata/Notes/URI_scheme
Cheers,
Denny
2012/7/5 Gregor Hagedorn g.m.haged...@gmail.com:
I don't mean to spin this out into a tangent about Drupal.
Me neither, my discussion point here is:
Hello Michael,
thank you for your input, this is extremely valuable.
In general I expect that Wikidata will serve your needs better than an
extraction from Wikipedia could. First, yes, we will have more stable
identifiers. Second, it should be better at identifying items of
interest. Some of the
On 04/07/2012 10:48, Denny Vrandečić denny.vrande...@wikimedia.de wrote:
Hello Michael,
thank you for your input, this is extremely valuable.
In general I expect that Wikidata will serve your needs better than an
extraction from Wikipedia could. First, yes, we will have more stable
On 3 July 2012 19:19, Tom Morris tfmor...@gmail.com wrote:
A few notes on the BBC's use of DBpedia which Dan thought might be of
interest to this list:
It's great to see real world use cases to inform the development
priorities of Wikidata.
Amen to that.
=== some problems we've found
