Re: [Wikidata-l] Wikidata name consistency

2012-05-10 Thread Daniel Kinzler
Hi Chris AS someone who as worked with the old Wikidata code, I must say I very much prefer to start over. The old code is convoluted and scales poorly. The approach of the new Wikibase extension is much cleaner. Some advantages: * we can use the storage and versioning facilities of mediawiki wi

Re: [Wikidata-l] Wikidata name consistency

2012-05-10 Thread Chris Tophe
Denny Vrandečić writes: > * OmegaWiki is geared towards replacing the Wiktionaries. Thus OmegaWiki > talks about words and their translations, the meaning of the words being given by their defined meaning. Actually, yes, this is what OmegaWiki is about, but OmegaWiki is only one possible impl

Re: [Wikidata-l] Wikidata name consistency

2012-05-09 Thread James HK
Hi, I'd like to return to the naming consistency topic, taken into account that the Wikidata project chose deliberately names like Wikibase/Wikibase client to identify their extension, people will get confused by [1] no matter what and assume that [1] extension is related to the Wikidata project w

Re: [Wikidata-l] Wikidata name consistency

2012-05-09 Thread Gerard Meijssen
Hoi, The KEY part of OmegaWiki is not so much that it is intended to replace Wiktionary, it is that it has language and concepts at its heart. This is in my opinion the only way to look at things .. consider: When you have a word that needs disambiguation, it follows that the Wikipedia article abou

Re: [Wikidata-l] Wikidata name consistency

2012-05-09 Thread Denny Vrandečić
2012/5/9 Lydia Pintscher > On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Chris Tophe > wrote:> Concerning collaboration between the two projects, > > I am not sure why the new-Wikidata is starting from scratch, and not from > > the > > old-Wikidata, but there are probably good reasons for that. > > Would any

Re: [Wikidata-l] Wikidata name consistency

2012-05-09 Thread Lydia Pintscher
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Chris Tophe wrote: > Dear Wikidata people, > > I see that there is now a mess in names, and I don't see > where (or if) this has been discussed anywhere. > > There is the "Wikidata extension" (on which the OmegaWiki dictionary is > based) > http://www.mediawiki.org

[Wikidata-l] Wikidata name consistency

2012-05-09 Thread Chris Tophe
Dear Wikidata people, I see that there is now a mess in names, and I don't see where (or if) this has been discussed anywhere. There is the "Wikidata extension" (on which the OmegaWiki dictionary is based) http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Wikidata http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikidata [no