Hey again,
getting over wasn't meant to be harsh. I was hoping though wiki in
Wikidata stands for a the broader concept of free and open, and
not a particular syntax for encoding knowledge.
I'm all for free and open knowledge, but I think sticking to the same
mechanisms which helped bootstrap
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Martynas Jusevicius
marty...@graphity.org wrote:
Hey again,
getting over wasn't meant to be harsh. I was hoping though wiki in
Wikidata stands for a the broader concept of free and open, and
not a particular syntax for encoding knowledge.
I'm all for free and
Martynas,
what you are proposing below is not W3C recommended RDF but an extension
of triples to quads. As far as I know, this extension is not compatible
yet with existing standards such as SPARQL and OWL. Named graphs work
with SPARQL, but are mostly used in another way than you suggest.
Binàris,
then you should coin a crystal clear definition of snak (could it be
made an acronym?) everyone can memorize and understand. Sounds also
as snap and snag. If you find a pun it would help it get accepted.
jfc
At 10:39 06/04/2012, Bináris wrote:
2012/4/5 Gregor Hagedorn
On 06.04.2012 14:28, Martynas Jusevicius wrote:
Hey again,
getting over wasn't meant to be harsh. I was hoping though wiki in
Wikidata stands for a the broader concept of free and open, and
not a particular syntax for encoding knowledge.
Dear Martynas
As stated in the proposal, we do not
Dear Martynas,
if you try to model the following statement in RDF
The population density of France, as of an 2012 estimate, is 116 per
square kilometer, according to the Bilan demographique 2010.
you might notice that RDF requires a reification of the statement. The data
model that you have
Denny said:
But if you find a simpler, and more RDFish way to express the (below)
statement, please feel free to enlighten me. I would be indeed very
interested.
The population density of France, as of an 2012 estimate, is 116 per square
kilometer, according to the Bilan demographique 2010.
A
John,
thanks! I fully agree.
And this is indeed pretty much what we have in our data model.*
I think that we really need to get our draft mapping to RDF done, in order
to show that we align pretty much with this suggestion.
Cheers,
Denny
* well, we also add density, but I think that is merely
Denny said:
you forgot to add something like
France#Density:2012_pop_estimate_Bilan_2010 property Density .
No I did not forget anything, given the Density 'namespace' in the subobject
name.
IOW your triple merely restates what is discernible from the subobject name.
Maybe you should tell me what
