On 11/10/2019 16:11, Lydia Pintscher wrote:
> We hadn't looked at edits other than terms as part of the change but
> it's something I agree we should have. I'll bump it up and see what we
> can do.
Awesome! I understand that this might require complicated refactoring on
your side, it's probably
In Phabricator terms, this corresponds to the following tickets:
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T191885
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T67846
Antonin
On 02/10/2019 09:52, Antonin Delpeuch (lists) wrote:
> Hi Léa,
>
> Sorry, my question was not very clear. Let us take the example of
>
Hi Léa,
Sorry, my question was not very clear. Let us take the example of
creating a new statement on an item. This can be done with wbeditentity
but also with other actions such as wbcreateclaim or wbsetclaim.
Is there any plan to reuse the summaries of these latter actions when
creating a
In the near future, we will have different edit summaries depending on how
many actions are made through the API.
- If 5 or less terms (item, description or alias) are changed, we will
display the expanded version: []
:
- Does that answer your question or did you mean something else? :)
-
This is great news! Thank you so much for working on this!
It must be hard to figure out how to generate summaries for a wide range
of edit shapes, but it is definitely useful.
I cannot tell from the Phab ticket whether you considered to reuse
existing summaries from atomic actions (such as
Hello all,
We are about to make some changes to edit summaries that appear when an
edit is made using wbeditentity API, which includes for example editing
terms (labels, descriptions, aliases) from the new mobile termbox. The
summary messages currently contain “Changed an Item” as a comment. The
