Re: [Wikidata] Using wikibase for creating structured vocabularies collaboratively

2016-10-14 Thread Jakob Voß
Hi Claudia
,
you wrote:

> We had a discussion about tools that allow for creating ontologies
> (or at least structured vocabularies) collaboratively in the context
> of terminology curation in the biological domain.
> 
> Some people were in favor for Semantic MediaWiki, which made me
> wonder if there are other projects than Wikidata that are using
> Wikibase for structuring their data.

I recently collected a list of Open Source web applications to create
Knowledge Organization Systems - including SMW and Wikibase:

http://coli-conc.gbv.de/publications/tr7.html
(=http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.61262)

The list lacks https://pypi.python.org/pypi/atramhasis and I omitted
applications with major focus on terminology management for translation
(aka termbases).

Both SWM and Wikibase support creation of knowledge bases without strict
schemata. The downside of their flexibility is a lack of constraints and
workflows that must be build on to of them with additional tools. Choice
of the right software for creating structured vocabularies very much
depends on the types and requirements of your vocabularies.

If you want some control, e.g. suggested and approved changes,
hierachies, controll of synonyms and homonyms and your vocabulary is a
"classical" knowledge organization system such as a authority files,
thesaurus or classifications, you may better try a dedicated software
such as the editors I found. I have not evaluated these applications so
I'am also curious about experiences with iQvoc, TemaTres, VocBench,
Ginco, and atramhasis.

If your vocabulary is more going to be an ontology then Semantic
MediaWiki or Wikibase (possibly also Web Protégé or VoCol) may be
required with additional customization. I'd first ask what you actually
mean by "ontology" - many so called ontologies are actually simply
extended thesauri, classifications or even dump term list that could
also be managed in a shared Google Spreadsheet.

My own experience in collaborative creating structured vocabularies
mainly focus small controlled list (=no need for dedicated software) and
on Wikidata (see http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1676/paper2.pdf). The latter is
a special case because you must involve in the existing Wikimedia
communities with all of its benefits (motivated collaborators,
real-world entities connected to other vocabularies, fame and glory...)
and downsides (less control, possibly tiresome discussions...). I prefer
this approach of harvesting and extending vocabularies from Wikidata
because the vocabularies are (or at least expected to be) founded in
actual use of terms by their connection to Wikidata articles instead
building yet another ivory tower ontology.

That's all for now, looking forward for more uses cases and experiences,
Jakob Voß

___
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata


Re: [Wikidata] Using wikibase for creating structured vocabularies collaboratively

2016-10-12 Thread Claudia Müller-Birn
Hi Denny,

I contacted him separately (just to make sure that he gets the question) and 
share the results.

Claudia

> On 12 Oct 2016, at 22:28, Denny Vrandečić  wrote:
> 
> No, wouldn't know of any. Wikibase is still rather new in this field, and to 
> the best of my knowledge there has been no evaluation of the two for the task 
> of collaborative vocabulary management.
> 
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 1:20 PM Claudia Müller-Birn  
> wrote:
> Dear Denny,
> 
> Thanks for the pointers, some of them are surprisingly new to me. However, I 
> was wondering if there are articles that especially compared Wikibase and 
> Semantic MediaWiki. Any idea?
> 
> Many thanks.
> 
> Claudia
> 
> > On 12 Oct 2016, at 22:05, Denny Vrandečić  wrote:
> >
> > SMW has been used successfully in the past for such projects, indeed has 
> > been developed with that in mind. A few papers here:
> >
> > http://www.semantic-cora.org/index.php/Publications_and_Talks
> >
> > http://www.aifb.kit.edu/web/Frank_Dengler/Publikationen/en
> >
> > https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=PdsmmEkJ&citation_for_view=PdsmmEkJ:IjCSPb-OGe4C
> > https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=PdsmmEkJ&citation_for_view=PdsmmEkJ:2osOgNQ5qMEC
> > https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=PdsmmEkJ&citation_for_view=PdsmmEkJ:Tyk-4Ss8FVUC
> >
> > https://km.aifb.kit.edu/ws/ckc2007/accepted.htm#papers
> >
> > But these are just a few pointers, and I am sure it is quite out of that by 
> > now.
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 12:54 PM Federico Leva (Nemo)  
> > wrote:
> > Claudia Müller-Birn, 12/10/2016 21:11:
> > > wonder if there are other projects than Wikidata that are using Wikibase 
> > > for structuring their data
> >
> > http://www.eagle-network.eu/wiki/index.php/Main_Page , as documented on
> > http://wikiba.se/projects/ . You can ask on this list if you have questions.
> >
> > Nemo
> >
> > ___
> > Wikidata mailing list
> > Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
> > ___
> > Wikidata mailing list
> > Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
> 
> 
> ___
> Wikidata mailing list
> Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
> ___
> Wikidata mailing list
> Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata


___
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata


Re: [Wikidata] Using wikibase for creating structured vocabularies collaboratively

2016-10-12 Thread Claudia Müller-Birn
Thanks Gregor. I will add this to my list.

Btw, I will distill all information and will share in a separate email.

So far, I am overwhelmed by all responses - great. 

Claudia

> On 12 Oct 2016, at 22:31, Gregor Hagedorn  
> wrote:
> 
> Here some old pointers to our TDWG - biodiversity - ViBRANT work from 2013:
> http://www.gbif.org/resource/80862
> https://mbgserv18.mobot.org/ocs/index.php/tdwg/2013/paper/view/545
> creating this SMW wiki:
> http://terms.tdwg.org/wiki/
> (with a SKOS vocab management system)
> 
> My own assessment: there are serious limitation in SMW, which can be worked 
> with (e.g. we use an in-wiki xslt script to post-process), but having a more 
> powerful system like wikidata would be most welcome.
> 
> However, to my present knowledge, the wikidata/wikibase based system would 
> have to have a custom programmed user interface to make it usable, something 
> the great semantic form extensions in SMW already make possible.
> 
> Best
> 
> gregor
> 
> ___
> Wikidata mailing list
> Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata


___
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata


Re: [Wikidata] Using wikibase for creating structured vocabularies collaboratively

2016-10-12 Thread Julie McMurry
Chris Mungall & co were just awarded a grant to develop tooling for mere
mortals to create ontologies.
Copying him in here to comment.

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Denny Vrandečić 
wrote:

> I don't know if Jakob Voss is on this list, but he had a recent paper on
> using Wikidata (not Wikibase) for NKOS terminology.
>
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 1:32 PM Gregor Hagedorn <
> gregor.haged...@mfn-berlin.de> wrote:
>
>> Here some old pointers to our TDWG - biodiversity - ViBRANT work from
>> 2013:
>> http://www.gbif.org/resource/80862
>> https://mbgserv18.mobot.org/ocs/index.php/tdwg/2013/paper/view/545
>> creating this SMW wiki:
>> http://terms.tdwg.org/wiki/
>> (with a SKOS vocab management system)
>>
>> My own assessment: there are serious limitation in SMW, which can be
>> worked with (e.g. we use an in-wiki xslt script to post-process), but
>> having a more powerful system like wikidata would be most welcome.
>>
>> However, to my present knowledge, the wikidata/wikibase based system
>> would have to have a custom programmed user interface to make it usable,
>> something the great semantic form extensions in SMW already make possible.
>>
>> Best
>>
>> gregor
>>
>> ___
>> Wikidata mailing list
>> Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
>>
>
> ___
> Wikidata mailing list
> Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
>
>


-- 
--
mcmurry.ju...@gmail.com +1 805 455 5877 skype: mcmurry.julie git: jmcmurry
--
___
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata


Re: [Wikidata] Using wikibase for creating structured vocabularies collaboratively

2016-10-12 Thread Denny Vrandečić
I don't know if Jakob Voss is on this list, but he had a recent paper on
using Wikidata (not Wikibase) for NKOS terminology.

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 1:32 PM Gregor Hagedorn <
gregor.haged...@mfn-berlin.de> wrote:

> Here some old pointers to our TDWG - biodiversity - ViBRANT work from 2013:
> http://www.gbif.org/resource/80862
> https://mbgserv18.mobot.org/ocs/index.php/tdwg/2013/paper/view/545
> creating this SMW wiki:
> http://terms.tdwg.org/wiki/
> (with a SKOS vocab management system)
>
> My own assessment: there are serious limitation in SMW, which can be
> worked with (e.g. we use an in-wiki xslt script to post-process), but
> having a more powerful system like wikidata would be most welcome.
>
> However, to my present knowledge, the wikidata/wikibase based system would
> have to have a custom programmed user interface to make it usable,
> something the great semantic form extensions in SMW already make possible.
>
> Best
>
> gregor
>
> ___
> Wikidata mailing list
> Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
>
___
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata


Re: [Wikidata] Using wikibase for creating structured vocabularies collaboratively

2016-10-12 Thread Gregor Hagedorn
Here some old pointers to our TDWG - biodiversity - ViBRANT work from 2013:
http://www.gbif.org/resource/80862
https://mbgserv18.mobot.org/ocs/index.php/tdwg/2013/paper/view/545
creating this SMW wiki:
http://terms.tdwg.org/wiki/
(with a SKOS vocab management system)

My own assessment: there are serious limitation in SMW, which can be worked
with (e.g. we use an in-wiki xslt script to post-process), but having a
more powerful system like wikidata would be most welcome.

However, to my present knowledge, the wikidata/wikibase based system would
have to have a custom programmed user interface to make it usable,
something the great semantic form extensions in SMW already make possible.

Best

gregor
___
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata


Re: [Wikidata] Using wikibase for creating structured vocabularies collaboratively

2016-10-12 Thread Denny Vrandečić
No, wouldn't know of any. Wikibase is still rather new in this field, and
to the best of my knowledge there has been no evaluation of the two for the
task of collaborative vocabulary management.

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 1:20 PM Claudia Müller-Birn 
wrote:

> Dear Denny,
>
> Thanks for the pointers, some of them are surprisingly new to me. However,
> I was wondering if there are articles that especially compared Wikibase and
> Semantic MediaWiki. Any idea?
>
> Many thanks.
>
> Claudia
>
> > On 12 Oct 2016, at 22:05, Denny Vrandečić  wrote:
> >
> > SMW has been used successfully in the past for such projects, indeed has
> been developed with that in mind. A few papers here:
> >
> > http://www.semantic-cora.org/index.php/Publications_and_Talks
> >
> > http://www.aifb.kit.edu/web/Frank_Dengler/Publikationen/en
> >
> >
> https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=PdsmmEkJ&citation_for_view=PdsmmEkJ:IjCSPb-OGe4C
> >
> https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=PdsmmEkJ&citation_for_view=PdsmmEkJ:2osOgNQ5qMEC
> >
> https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=PdsmmEkJ&citation_for_view=PdsmmEkJ:Tyk-4Ss8FVUC
> >
> > https://km.aifb.kit.edu/ws/ckc2007/accepted.htm#papers
> >
> > But these are just a few pointers, and I am sure it is quite out of that
> by now.
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 12:54 PM Federico Leva (Nemo) <
> nemow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Claudia Müller-Birn, 12/10/2016 21:11:
> > > wonder if there are other projects than Wikidata that are using
> Wikibase for structuring their data
> >
> > http://www.eagle-network.eu/wiki/index.php/Main_Page , as documented on
> > http://wikiba.se/projects/ . You can ask on this list if you have
> questions.
> >
> > Nemo
> >
> > ___
> > Wikidata mailing list
> > Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
> > ___
> > Wikidata mailing list
> > Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
>
>
> ___
> Wikidata mailing list
> Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
>
___
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata


Re: [Wikidata] Using wikibase for creating structured vocabularies collaboratively

2016-10-12 Thread Claudia Müller-Birn
Dear Denny,

Thanks for the pointers, some of them are surprisingly new to me. However, I 
was wondering if there are articles that especially compared Wikibase and 
Semantic MediaWiki. Any idea?

Many thanks.

Claudia

> On 12 Oct 2016, at 22:05, Denny Vrandečić  wrote:
> 
> SMW has been used successfully in the past for such projects, indeed has been 
> developed with that in mind. A few papers here:
> 
> http://www.semantic-cora.org/index.php/Publications_and_Talks 
> 
> http://www.aifb.kit.edu/web/Frank_Dengler/Publikationen/en 
> 
> https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=PdsmmEkJ&citation_for_view=PdsmmEkJ:IjCSPb-OGe4C
>  
> https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=PdsmmEkJ&citation_for_view=PdsmmEkJ:2osOgNQ5qMEC
>  
> https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=PdsmmEkJ&citation_for_view=PdsmmEkJ:Tyk-4Ss8FVUC
>  
> 
> https://km.aifb.kit.edu/ws/ckc2007/accepted.htm#papers 
> 
> But these are just a few pointers, and I am sure it is quite out of that by 
> now. 
> 
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 12:54 PM Federico Leva (Nemo)  
> wrote:
> Claudia Müller-Birn, 12/10/2016 21:11:
> > wonder if there are other projects than Wikidata that are using Wikibase 
> > for structuring their data
> 
> http://www.eagle-network.eu/wiki/index.php/Main_Page , as documented on
> http://wikiba.se/projects/ . You can ask on this list if you have questions.
> 
> Nemo
> 
> ___
> Wikidata mailing list
> Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
> ___
> Wikidata mailing list
> Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata


___
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata


Re: [Wikidata] Using wikibase for creating structured vocabularies collaboratively

2016-10-12 Thread Denny Vrandečić
SMW has been used successfully in the past for such projects, indeed has
been developed with that in mind. A few papers here:

http://www.semantic-cora.org/index.php/Publications_and_Talks

http://www.aifb.kit.edu/web/Frank_Dengler/Publikationen/en

https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=PdsmmEkJ&citation_for_view=PdsmmEkJ:IjCSPb-OGe4C

https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=PdsmmEkJ&citation_for_view=PdsmmEkJ:2osOgNQ5qMEC

https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=PdsmmEkJ&citation_for_view=PdsmmEkJ:Tyk-4Ss8FVUC


https://km.aifb.kit.edu/ws/ckc2007/accepted.htm#papers

But these are just a few pointers, and I am sure it is quite out of that by
now.

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 12:54 PM Federico Leva (Nemo) 
wrote:

> Claudia Müller-Birn, 12/10/2016 21:11:
> > wonder if there are other projects than Wikidata that are using Wikibase
> for structuring their data
>
> http://www.eagle-network.eu/wiki/index.php/Main_Page , as documented on
> http://wikiba.se/projects/ . You can ask on this list if you have
> questions.
>
> Nemo
>
> ___
> Wikidata mailing list
> Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
>
___
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata


Re: [Wikidata] Using wikibase for creating structured vocabularies collaboratively

2016-10-12 Thread Claudia Müller-Birn
Dear Nemo,

Great. Thank you. I will check this out and get back to you with questions 
(especially regarding the organisational setup) :)

Best,
Claudia

> On 12 Oct 2016, at 21:54, Federico Leva (Nemo)  wrote:
> 
> Claudia Müller-Birn, 12/10/2016 21:11:
>> wonder if there are other projects than Wikidata that are using Wikibase for 
>> structuring their data
> 
> http://www.eagle-network.eu/wiki/index.php/Main_Page , as documented on 
> http://wikiba.se/projects/ . You can ask on this list if you have questions.
> 
> Nemo
> 
> ___
> Wikidata mailing list
> Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata


___
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata


Re: [Wikidata] Using wikibase for creating structured vocabularies collaboratively

2016-10-12 Thread Federico Leva (Nemo)

Claudia Müller-Birn, 12/10/2016 21:11:

wonder if there are other projects than Wikidata that are using Wikibase for 
structuring their data


http://www.eagle-network.eu/wiki/index.php/Main_Page , as documented on 
http://wikiba.se/projects/ . You can ask on this list if you have questions.


Nemo

___
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata


[Wikidata] Using wikibase for creating structured vocabularies collaboratively

2016-10-12 Thread Claudia Müller-Birn
Dear all,

We had a discussion about tools that allow for creating ontologies (or at least 
structured vocabularies) collaboratively in the context of terminology curation 
in the biological domain. 

Some people were in favor for Semantic MediaWiki, which made me wonder if there 
are other projects than Wikidata that are using Wikibase for structuring their 
data. 

I would be very interested in learning about experiences when setting up and 
using Wikibase locally. I have neither set up Semantic MediaWiki or Wikibase 
myself yet, and a better comparison of the two design principles behind the 
tools from a user’s perspective would be great. If you have any link, 
information, article to share in this direction, I would be happy because I 
couldn’t find anything by myself. 

Thanks in advance and I am happy to explain my use case in more detail if 
needed.

Best,
Claudia

..

Human-Centered Computing (HCC)
Freie Universität Berlin  |  Institute of Computer Science 
https://hcc.mi.fu-berlin.de



___
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata