Jesse,
Having this style guide nearing completion has re-energized my desire
to get the featured works approach to Quality Assurance going again. I
believe it had stalled for two main reasons;
1) Not having this key piece of a style guide in place.
2) Having a larger group prepared to execute a
Hi Peter,
I think QA framework has establsihed a solid foundation.
To be fair, our community has not focused attention on how workgroups will
function and that has also been a drawback regarding progress and
participation on the QA framework not to mention that quality is a complex
theme.
The
Hi,
One of the (many) things I love about the wiki and our (growing) community,
is that there is space to come in, and out. When someone picks up on
something that someone else does (I'm thinking Jesse's comments), then
there's the opportunity to inject fresh energy and new momentum - the
Yes, its a journey that will not necessarily follow the most direct
route. Good thing as often with technology the destination can change.
And yes it is great Jesse has picked up the style guide ball. Great
Work Jesse!
I have now gone through all the the proposed guidelines with the
following
Thanks, Peter!
Having adherence to the style guidelines as a qualification for featured
content is a great incentive. Thanks for pointing it out!
Jesse
On 23/07/2009 19:49, Peter wrote:
Jesse,
This is awesome! Good on you for taking this on.
I saw the style guidelines being promoted or
Jesse,
This is awesome! Good on you for taking this on.
I saw the style guidelines being promoted or incentivised via the
featured works process;
http://wikieducator.org/WikiEducator:Quality_Assurance_and_Review/Featured_learning_resource
As usual this is all open to modification and
