Creating the phrase cultural agoraphobia.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/apr/05/digital-media-referenceandlanguages
- d.
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
2009/4/5 Oskar Sigvardsson oskarsigvards...@gmail.com:
I think it's very clear that wikipedia has developed a very successful
model, not least because many other wikis seem to almost automatically
adopt our style and policies. In short: Wikipedia Works.
NPOV is our key innovation. Much more
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 1:36 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
NPOV is our key innovation. Much more radical than letting anyone edit
the website.
Two things which, incidentally, go hand in hand. NPOV would be
virtually impossible to achieve without open and public debate about
every
2009/4/5 Oskar Sigvardsson oskarsigvards...@gmail.com:
I think it's very clear that wikipedia has developed a very successful
model, not least because many other wikis seem to almost automatically
adopt our style and policies. In short: Wikipedia Works.
NPOV is our key innovation. Much
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 1:36 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
NPOV is our key innovation. Much more radical than letting anyone edit
the website.
Two things which, incidentally, go hand in hand. NPOV would be
virtually impossible to achieve without open and public debate about
every
Yes, but failures to present a complete spectrum of points of view can
be
balanced by including a NPOV article imported from Wikipedia.
Or, indeed, by linking to the editorial pages of major newspapers from
an NPOV article *on* Wikipedia...
--
That would be true if it were not for the
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Fred Bauder fredb...@fairpoint.net wrote:
Yes, but failures to present a complete spectrum of points of view can
be
balanced by including a NPOV article imported from Wikipedia.
Or, indeed, by linking to the editorial pages of major newspapers from
an NPOV
2009/4/5 Fred Bauder fredb...@fairpoint.net:
The obvious alternative is to allow point of view editing but structure
the wiki to include articles from diverse points of view, not an
innovation, editorial pages of major newspapers are typically structured
in that way.
I'd say that's not
Sam Korn wrote:
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 12:36 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/4/5 Oskar Sigvardsson oskarsigvards...@gmail.com
I think it's very clear that wikipedia has developed a very successful
model, not least because many other wikis seem to almost automatically
adopt
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 10:12 PM, Ray Saintonge sainto...@telus.net wrote:
Sam Korn wrote:
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 12:36 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/4/5 Oskar Sigvardsson oskarsigvards...@gmail.com
I think it's very clear that wikipedia has developed a very successful
model,
On Sun, 5 Apr 2009 08:13:23 -0600 (MDT), Fred Bauder wrote:
Wikipedia works like Wall Street works,
Not exactly the most auspicious example to use these days...
--
== Dan ==
Dan's Mail Format Site: http://mailformat.dan.info/
Dan's Web Tips: http://webtips.dan.info/
Dan's Domain Site:
I use the somewhat shorter message,
Do not create articles without references. If you have the
information to write the article, you got it from somewhere. Say where
. Articles without references are likely to get deleted. I advise you
to do this the moment you create the article, to avoid
12 matches
Mail list logo
