from that issue, though, a Draft namespace does sound like a
smoother workflow, as you suggest. If you can't get a canonical namespace
in, Wikipedia:Drafts/Page[/Version] might not be a bad naming convention.
--
Luna Santin
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Luna_Santin
that it's only viewed by you on your
own searches, if not necessarily as a matter of policy), but I notice the
button to submit a comment is labelled Make a public comment; confusing!
-Luna
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Al Tally majorly.w...@googlemail.comwrote:
If there is talk page consensus, does the page really still need to be
fully
protected?
Not all protection is in response to edit warring. First example to come to
mind: high-use templates.
-Luna
a shift from notability to maintainability as a primary
inclusion guideline. Lack of suitable sourcing makes maintenance difficult,
because it's that much harder for us to be sure of accuracy and NPOV. If
nothing else, the two ideas might complement each other well.
-Luna
Maybe we should stop reverting vandalism. It would improve our statistics,
after all.
-Luna
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
a project finally giving this a go, and I'm very
curious to hear how it works out for them. I wish them good luck.
-Luna
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman
to be clear, I didn't say anything in the post about experts having a
moral obligation to contribute. The moral part of this conversation came
in the form of a comment from a person who dugg the blog post.
Thanks for the clarification.
-Luna
___
WikiEN-l
we so direly need.
-Luna
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
actually
gets you all actions committed *by* a user, not necessarily targeting that
user. To get log actions targeting a specific user, the title field needs
to be User:Whatever.
Like so:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Log?page=User:Wp_freedom_fighter
-Luna
. Your
incessant term is a gross mischaracterization.
Interesting that you deny making any personal attacks, and yet you
immediately leap to defend specific comments, as if you knew exactly which
ones I might be referring to. Hm!
Anyway, you seem to have knocked that off lately. Thanks.
-Luna
to? -- are a but off-putting, as well.
-Luna
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
, I believe we generally
consider it non-free.
Where the clear intent of a photo is to reproduce a given text verbatim, I
should think that the original copyright on that text (if any) still
applies. Photographing pages of a book doesn't suddenly render the book's
copyright moot, for example.
-Luna
become a significant behavioral issue,
without necessarily commenting for or against it.
Looks like the block expired two weeks ago, ish. Not that I'm trying to
stifle discussion, just hoping to make that clear for perspective.
-Luna
___
WikiEN-l mailing
, the majority of cases I see are terribly mundane,
Foo is dumb and his phone number is xxx-xxx- types.
-Luna
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo
, all templates are simply expanded into plain old wikitext on the page
to be displayed.
-Luna
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
to be part of something greater than oneself, and to
aid in the work of so many others, was something I just couldn't pass up.
For better or worse, there's never a dull day on the wiki.
-Luna
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
help but use our services.
-Luna
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
date | date}}
This might have some problems with page cache, and honestly I'm a bit
dubious about its utility, but from a template standpoint it shouldn't be
too hard.
-Luna
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:41 PM, stevertigo stv...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Carcharoth
*, the security gained in removing those rights seems questionable.
Sanity checks might work in a small community, but assuming a user has been
gone for years, I don't see the utility.
-Luna
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe
anyone
would want to avoid the boxes.
It's not just bots that want information in an easily parsed format.
-Luna
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 7:04 AM, Carcharoth carcharot...@googlemail.comwrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 2:52 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/blogger
for ideas.
-Luna
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
21 matches
Mail list logo
