On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:02:52 EDT, wjhon...@{gag,vomit,retch}aol.com
wrote:
That's overreading and here is why.
Omaha is in Nebraska. Henry Fonda was born in Omaha.
Henry Fonda was born in Nebraska.
Nebraska is a state with a low population which grows mainly corn.
Henry Fonda was born in a
I agree that it is not original research to out someone. It is not prudent,
though. My pseudonyms do not ask anybody to believe that I am posting under
my given and family names. Someone might ask why, and
I will tell them that I do not consider those names to be guarded secrets.
Eric Blair
2009/4/24 Nathan nawr...@gmail.com:
The OR policy includes reference to original synthesis - which is not
creating a primary source, but using available sources to draw an original
conclusion. In this case, connecting the dots is absolutely original
analysis leading to an original conclusion.
In a message dated 4/24/2009 6:30:19 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
nawr...@gmail.com writes:
The OR policy includes reference to original synthesis - which is not
creating a primary source, but using available sources to draw an original
conclusion. In this case, connecting the dots is
2009/4/24 wjhon...@aol.com:
We have no source which states this. It is a trival inference from the
known statements. We are allows to make trivial inferences, observations,
conclusions.
Yes, trivial is fine. From my understanding of this case (I haven't
researched it in depth), the
In a message dated 4/24/2009 1:06:13 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
thomas.dal...@gmail.com writes:
Yes, trivial is fine. From my understanding of this case (I haven't
researched it in depth), the inference was not trivial.
Mr Brown shot his wife on 13 Aug 2006 in
Those two sequences of conclusions aren't the same. There is no original
conclusion in the Henry Fonda/Nebraska. This is more analogous to you saying
I've seen lots of corn in Nebraska, I know Fonda is from Omaha, therefore
Fonda was born near lots of corn.
Anyway, the policy is clear. You often
2009/4/24 wjhon...@aol.com:
In a message dated 4/24/2009 1:06:13 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
thomas.dal...@gmail.com writes:
Yes, trivial is fine. From my understanding of this case (I haven't
researched it in depth), the inference was not trivial.
Mr Brown shot
In a message dated 4/24/2009 1:22:59 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
nawr...@gmail.com writes:
Anyway, the policy is clear. You often have an opinion on Wikipedia
policies
and practices that differs from the normal consensus interpretation, but it
is the consensus interpretation that binds and
It is my opinion that you cannot defame a person by telling the truth.
This, like libel, is simply a way to try to use a hammer.
You can't libel garbage by saying it stinks.
Simply using newspaper archives does not constitute original research.
So there must be more to your story than is
2009/4/24 wjhon...@aol.com:
It is my opinion that you cannot defame a person by telling the truth.
This, like libel, is simply a way to try to use a hammer.
You can't libel garbage by saying it stinks.
Simply using newspaper archives does not constitute original research.
So there must
In a message dated 4/23/2009 7:14:17 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
oldakqu...@gmail.com writes:
At the time, the basis of identifying
him was putting known facts about the pseudonymous author (date of
imprisonment, French Foreign Legion membership), against an old
newspaper article containing
2009/4/24 wjhon...@aol.com:
In a message dated 4/23/2009 7:14:17 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
oldakqu...@gmail.com writes:
At the time, the basis of identifying
him was putting known facts about the pseudonymous author (date of
imprisonment, French Foreign Legion membership), against an
In a message dated 4/23/2009 7:33:02 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
oldakqu...@gmail.com writes:
What if there had been more than one person imprisoned that
year who had been a member of the French Foreign Legion? This is not
inconceivable, since many people are imprisoned every year, and it is
14 matches
Mail list logo
