Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
WMC lost his admin tools over his block of me during RfAr/Abd-William
M. Connolley, but that was not by any means an isolated incident.
Mmmm, no. William's fuse is shorter than ideal. Obvious enough to many
people, and over the years there has been much
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 3:52 AM, Charles Matthews
charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com wrote:
Mmmm, no. William's fuse is shorter than ideal. Obvious enough to many
people, and over the years there has been much provocation over at the
climate change articles. Now what was that word they use on the
2009/12/21 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com:
The article was likely overstated. However, the editor involved did
have a substantial history of using administrative tools with respect
to global warming and related articles, as well as extensive editing
in the area, taking a consistent
At 12:04 PM 12/21/2009, David Gerard wrote:
2009/12/21 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com:
The article was likely overstated. However, the editor involved did
have a substantial history of using administrative tools with respect
to global warming and related articles, as well as
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
At 12:04 PM 12/21/2009, David Gerard wrote:
This is the one you were taken to arbitration over, and was the source
of your proposal that experts be banned from editing articles on their
expertise.
Not at all, completely incorrect, even though asserted
Nathan wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 3:52 AM, Charles Matthews
charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com wrote:
Mmmm, no. William's fuse is shorter than ideal. Obvious enough to many
people, and over the years there has been much provocation over at the
climate change articles. Now what was that
Jussi-Ville Heiskanen wrote:
The Trolls of mythology, however, totally got the shaft.
In internet terms. Trolling was always a verb, originally,
and never a pronoun; and it referred to techniques of fishing.
Thank you. I have often despaired of finding anyone on the net who
understood
At 03:08 PM 12/19/2009, Ken Arromdee wrote:
Now has a Slashdot story:
http://slashdot.org/submission/1137140/Climategate-spreads-to-Wikipedia
Which links to two articles:
http://www.nationalpost.com/opinion/columnists/story.html?id=62e1c98e-01ed-4c55-bf3d-5078af9cb409
Now has a Slashdot story:
http://slashdot.org/submission/1137140/Climategate-spreads-to-Wikipedia
Which links to two articles:
http://www.nationalpost.com/opinion/columnists/story.html?id=62e1c98e-01ed-4c55-bf3d-5078af9cb409
Ken Arromdee wrote:
Now has a Slashdot story:
http://slashdot.org/submission/1137140/Climategate-spreads-to-Wikipedia
Which links to two articles:
http://www.nationalpost.com/opinion/columnists/story.html?id=62e1c98e-01ed-4c55-bf3d-5078af9cb409
2009/12/19 Ken Arromdee arrom...@rahul.net:
Now has a Slashdot story:
http://slashdot.org/submission/1137140/Climategate-spreads-to-Wikipedia
Which links to two articles:
http://www.nationalpost.com/opinion/columnists/story.html?id=62e1c98e-01ed-4c55-bf3d-5078af9cb409
I'll add that it doesn't appear to actually be a story yet, just a
submission made through Firehose. Regular /.ers have clearly spoken
as to how they feel about it, as noted by the colorful tags placed on
the submission and its poor rating. Meanwhile, the article itself is
a misleading,
2009/12/19 Amory Meltzer amorymelt...@gmail.com:
I'll add that it doesn't appear to actually be a story yet, just a
submission made through Firehose. Regular /.ers have clearly spoken
as to how they feel about it, as noted by the colorful tags placed on
the submission and its poor rating.
We all know William Connolley is an advocate for taking climate change
seriously. However there remains a lack of reliable information which
negates his position. If there was such information, those of us who
follow this issue would have settled his beeswax fast enough.
Fred
Ken Arromdee
2009/12/19 Fred Bauder fredb...@fairpoint.net:
We all know William Connolley is an advocate for taking climate change
seriously. However there remains a lack of reliable information which
negates his position. If there was such information, those of us who
follow this issue would have settled
Clearly this is just a plot by scientists to take money from oil companies
(well, only some of them, because Shell and BP support action) and give it
to investment bankers in order to build bird-killing windmills.
This plot was hatched back in the 1960s, when MIT climatologist Ed Lorenz
Climate change is a myth. There have always been palm trees on the
Antarctic peninsula...
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 8:11 PM, The Cunctator cuncta...@gmail.com wrote:
Clearly this is just a plot by scientists to take money from oil companies
(well, only some of them, because Shell and BP support
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009, David Gerard wrote:
Indeed. Ken was presumably sent this link by a troll and mistook it
for something that actually had any chance of ending up published.
Actually, I routinely browse Firehose and didn't realize that I had jumped
the gun by sending the link here while it's
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009, David Gerard wrote:
Indeed. Ken was presumably sent this link by a troll and mistook it
for something that actually had any chance of ending up published.
Actually, I routinely browse Firehose and didn't realize that I had
jumped
the gun by sending the link here while
19 matches
Mail list logo
