Thanks for the hint
http://www.lurkmoarpedia.com/wiki/LurkMoarpedia is gone, but the
google cache delivered some hints and by searching for the sentence
"After Encyclopedia Dramatica was * over by the *"I was able
to find the site http://www.encyclopediadramatica.ch/Wikipedia
nice, lets se
> On Tue, 17 May 2011, David Gerard wrote:
>> The new site has indeed had about 0 verifiable third-party coverage.
>
> But the problem is that it's being treated as a "new site" and therefore
> all
> the notability and such has to start from scratch. How do we determine
> that
> something remains
On 17 May 2011 17:19, Ken Arromdee wrote:
> On Tue, 17 May 2011, David Gerard wrote:
>> The new site has indeed had about 0 verifiable third-party coverage.
> But the problem is that it's being treated as a "new site" and therefore all
> the notability and such has to start from scratch. How do
On Tue, 17 May 2011, David Gerard wrote:
> The new site has indeed had about 0 verifiable third-party coverage.
But the problem is that it's being treated as a "new site" and therefore all
the notability and such has to start from scratch. How do we determine that
something remains the "same site
On 17 May 2011 16:28, Ken Arromdee wrote:
> Summary: This site is a controversial site that is often considered an attack
> site, but we have an article about it anyway. The site shut down and the
> users of the old site restarted it at a different location. Wikipedia has
> decided that site sh
Disclaimer: I don't actually use ED and what I know of it comes from mentions
on the talk page and here, which seems to be quite enough to understand this:
Summary: This site is a controversial site that is often considered an attack
site, but we have an article about it anyway. The site shut dow