Re: [WikiEN-l] Encyclopedia Dramatica

2011-05-17 Thread Mike Dupont
Thanks for the hint http://www.lurkmoarpedia.com/wiki/LurkMoarpedia is gone, but the google cache delivered some hints and by searching for the sentence "After Encyclopedia Dramatica was * over by the *"I was able to find the site http://www.encyclopediadramatica.ch/Wikipedia nice, lets se

Re: [WikiEN-l] Encyclopedia Dramatica

2011-05-17 Thread Fred Bauder
> On Tue, 17 May 2011, David Gerard wrote: >> The new site has indeed had about 0 verifiable third-party coverage. > > But the problem is that it's being treated as a "new site" and therefore > all > the notability and such has to start from scratch. How do we determine > that > something remains

Re: [WikiEN-l] Encyclopedia Dramatica

2011-05-17 Thread David Gerard
On 17 May 2011 17:19, Ken Arromdee wrote: > On Tue, 17 May 2011, David Gerard wrote: >> The new site has indeed had about 0 verifiable third-party coverage. > But the problem is that it's being treated as a "new site" and therefore all > the notability and such has to start from scratch.  How do

Re: [WikiEN-l] Encyclopedia Dramatica

2011-05-17 Thread Ken Arromdee
On Tue, 17 May 2011, David Gerard wrote: > The new site has indeed had about 0 verifiable third-party coverage. But the problem is that it's being treated as a "new site" and therefore all the notability and such has to start from scratch. How do we determine that something remains the "same site

Re: [WikiEN-l] Encyclopedia Dramatica

2011-05-17 Thread David Gerard
On 17 May 2011 16:28, Ken Arromdee wrote: > Summary: This site is a controversial site that is often considered an attack > site, but we have an article about it anyway.  The site shut down and the > users of the old site restarted it at a different location.  Wikipedia has > decided that site sh

[WikiEN-l] Encyclopedia Dramatica

2011-05-17 Thread Ken Arromdee
Disclaimer: I don't actually use ED and what I know of it comes from mentions on the talk page and here, which seems to be quite enough to understand this: Summary: This site is a controversial site that is often considered an attack site, but we have an article about it anyway. The site shut dow