On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Ken Arromdee arrom...@rahul.net wrote:
Yeah, Wikipedia Art are basically trolls, but I find this disturbing. If
Wikipedia can make legal threats to trolls and deny it, and accuse trolls
of
trademark violation in a baseless way, they can do it to anyone, and
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 7:14 PM, wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
If I create a piece of art using Coca-Cola bottles and call it Coca-Cola
Art am I infringing on a trademark?
Maybe.
Or am I describing my art piece accurately?
Sort of.
___
WikiEN-l
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 10:34 PM, Ray Saintonge sainto...@telus.net wrote:
wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
If I create a piece of art using Coca-Cola bottles and call it Coca-Cola
Art am I infringing on a trademark? Or am I describing my art piece
accurately?
Was Andy Warhol ever sued for his
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 1:57 AM, wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
The point isn't whether you take a picture of a Campbell's soup can and
call it Soup Five. The point is can you call it Campbell Soup Art
The name you give it, is the point. Not what the subject matter is.
According to Wikipedia, he
2009/4/26 Anthony wikim...@inbox.org:
The next time someone gets a
letter from the WMF lawyers, they ought to know to read it carefully to
discern whether it's a bona fide legal threat or just the WMF holding out a
tin cup and asking for favors.
Well, they should already know that when you
From the Foundation-L post:
we sent a letter to
Wikipedia Art that was aimed, not to threaten legal action, but to outline
what our legal concerns were, and to try to begin a negotiation to resolve
the matter amicably -- ideally by switching the domain name over to us, but
not by requiring any
This is disingenuous. A letter sent by a law firm to outline our legal
concerns which uses legal language and tells a site that they will
settle
matters amicably if they meet a demand is a legal threat. It may not
actually
include the words or we will sue you, but trying to spin it as not
Fred Bauder wrote:
This is disingenuous. A letter sent by a law firm to outline our legal
concerns which uses legal language and tells a site that they will
settle
matters amicably if they meet a demand is a legal threat. It may not
actually
include the words or we will sue you, but trying
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009, Fred Bauder wrote:
This is disingenuous. A letter sent by a law firm to outline our legal
concerns which uses legal language and tells a site that they will
settle
matters amicably if they meet a demand is a legal threat. It may not
actually
include the words or
If I create a piece of art using Coca-Cola bottles and call it Coca-Cola
Art am I infringing on a trademark? Or am I describing my art piece
accurately?
Will Johnson
**
A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy
On 26 Apr 2009 at 09:24:54 -0700 (PDT), Ken Arromdee wrote:
From the Foundation-L post:
we sent a letter to
Wikipedia Art that was aimed, not to threaten legal action, but to outline
what our legal concerns were, and to try to begin a negotiation to resolve
the matter amicably -- ideally
2009/4/27 Ray Saintonge sainto...@telus.net
wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
If I create a piece of art using Coca-Cola bottles and call it Coca-Cola
Art am I infringing on a trademark? Or am I describing my art piece
accurately?
Was Andy Warhol ever sued for his Campbell Soup cans?
I think
The point isn't whether you take a picture of a Campbell's soup can and
call it Soup Five. The point is can you call it Campbell Soup Art
The name you give it, is the point. Not what the subject matter is.
Will Johnson
**
A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just
13 matches
Mail list logo
