What do you propose?
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 6:00 AM, FT2 ft2.w...@gmail.com wrote:
It's a major issue, and needs recognition as such and a cultural problem,
not just on ANI but anywhere it happens.
FT2.
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 9:43 PM, Ryan Delaney ryan.dela...@gmail.com
wrote:
It
It's a major issue, and needs recognition as such and a cultural problem,
not just on ANI but anywhere it happens.
FT2.
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 9:43 PM, Ryan Delaney ryan.dela...@gmail.comwrote:
It seems like the trick is to work toward implementing this as an actual
cultural ideology,
I think you're missing the point, or not appreciating where I'm looking. The
point about basic attitudes is they inform all other discussions. An admin
who embodies courtesy, thoughtfulness, calmness, balance, is not the kind
who will be (as you describe) fundamentally unwilling to talk about it,
(By comparison and to underline what is possible, I've had thank you notes
on-wiki, multiple times not just once, from people whose articles I deleted
or whose AFD noms I closed against them, thanking me for a fair and well
reasoned summing up and for the courtesy shown to them
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 5:18 PM, FT2 ft2.w...@gmail.com wrote:
But I think the key norms are universally accepted.
Take No personal attacks and civility as two examples. Differences may
exist whether a particular matter is or isnt an attack or uncivil, whether
to act or ignore it, and a
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 8:32 PM, George Herbert
george.herb...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 7:58 PM, Fred Bauder fredb...@fairpoint.net
wrote:
On 14 July 2010 02:07, FT2 ft2.w...@gmail.com wrote:
The expectations upon admins are the pivot point for that. See [[
User:FT2/RfA
I have a few problems with the above thread too, but perhaps different ones.
Admins will naturally have a strong say in decisions being active
experienced users who have achieved wide respect and are often involved in
abuse and conduct related decisions. But they don't necessarily have special
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 3:22 PM, FT2 ft2.w...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a few problems with the above thread too, but perhaps different
ones.
Admins will naturally have a strong say in decisions being active
experienced users who have achieved wide respect and are often involved in
abuse and
I should say, the fact we are willing to discuss not assume is fine.
Obviosuly the harm and upset arising is not.
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 1:18 AM, FT2 ft2.w...@gmail.com wrote:
(Snip)
The second problem beyond that is the problem of fiddling while Rome
burns. While we potter round discussing
