I don't see why this script shouldn't be permanently installed into
Common.js assuming it works.
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 10:03 AM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28 March 2014 01:02, Richard Farmbrough rich...@farmbrough.co.uk
wrote:
On 08/03/2014 09:20, David Gerard wrote:
I
*Most often requested* nonexistent articles per day (based on *149* days in
year *2008*).
?
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Richard Farmbrough
rich...@farmbrough.co.uk wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Most_missed_articles
On 08/03/2014 09:20, David Gerard wrote:
I recall
On 28 March 2014 01:02, Richard Farmbrough rich...@farmbrough.co.uk wrote:
On 08/03/2014 09:20, David Gerard wrote:
I recall finding a list somewhere of article titles that got lots of hits
but didn't have articles, but don't recall where. I may be misremembering of
course. - d.
Like so much it needs updating. It is of historical interest, at the
very least. For example I discovered the unusual [[List of big-bust
models and performers]] which was deleted at the 6th AfD, partly on the
basis that it was redundant to [[Category:Big-bust models and
performers]]. This
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Most_missed_articles
On 08/03/2014 09:20, David Gerard wrote:
I recall finding a list somewhere of article titles that got lots of
hits but didn't have articles, but don't recall where. I may be
misremembering of course. - d.
On 9 March 2014 10:46, Elias Friedman elipo...@gmail.com wrote:
Wouldn't that be running afoul of the Citogenesis problem that Randall
Munroe so succinctly pointed out in his xkcd web comic:
https://xkcd.com/978/
No. If you are writing the sources for scratch rather than just copying
The most recent discussion is at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Baader-Meinhof_phenomenon_(4th_nomination)-
-the basic argument was lack of sufficiently reliable sources, and,
looking at the deleted article, I can see that it was a reasonable basis
for deletion. The
The reason the name stuck is that Baader-Meinhof is a weird name, and one
would not expect to see it multiple times independently in short
succession. Hence the name Baader-Meinhof phenomenon (which is also the
name of a book) is analogous to onomatopoeia in that both represent the
thing they are
Wouldn't that be running afoul of the Citogenesis problem that Randall
Munroe so succinctly pointed out in his xkcd web comic:
https://xkcd.com/978/
Elias Max Friedman A.S., CCEMT-P
אליהו מתתיהו בן צבי
elipo...@gmail.com
יְהִי אוֹר
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 1:19 PM, David Gerard
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 15:04:31 -0700, Brian J Mingus wrote:
Wikipedia's policies are irrelevant: This phenomenon has entered the
lexicon, and is now well known simply due to its existence in Wikipedia.
I wouldn't say that Wikipedia's policies are irrelevant to anything
regarding Wikipedia, as
On 5 March 2014 22:04, Brian J Mingus brian.min...@colorado.edu wrote:
Wikipedia's policies are irrelevant: This phenomenon has entered the
lexicon, and is now well known simply due to its existence in Wikipedia.
Since the phenomenon didn't have a well known name, I've been telling
people
On 8 March 2014 18:04, Brian J Mingus brian.min...@colorado.edu wrote:
The reason the name stuck is that Baader-Meinhof is a weird name, and one
would not expect to see it multiple times independently in short succession.
Hence the name Baader-Meinhof phenomenon (which is also the name of a
And I thought it was just the Baader, Browder, Bauer phenomenon...
Fred Bauder
On 8 March 2014 18:04, Brian J Mingus brian.min...@colorado.edu wrote:
The reason the name stuck is that Baader-Meinhof is a weird name, and
one
would not expect to see it multiple times independently in short
13 matches
Mail list logo
