On 5 March 2014 22:04, Brian J Mingus <brian.min...@colorado.edu> wrote:
> Wikipedia's policies are irrelevant: This phenomenon has entered the > lexicon, and is now well known simply due to its existence in Wikipedia. > Since the phenomenon didn't have a well known name, I've been telling > people about it for quite some time now, and it has recently enjoyed a huge > surge in popularity, *due to its existence on Wikipedia*. At least we killed "analogue disc record" before it entered English. > The article should reinstated, a section concerning the unique nature of > its notability should be added. This argument doesn't seem to convince (though that does resemble reasonable popularity). The fourth AFD notes the problem in this case: really crappy sources. The sort of thing that would lead me to !vote "delete without prejudice". I recall finding a list somewhere of article titles that got lots of hits but didn't have articles, but don't recall where. I may be misremembering of course. - d. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
