On Tue, 6 Oct 2015 at 01:59 Lodewijk wrote:
> Did anyone do a calculation whether holding it in an expensive city (say,
> London) with cheaper flights actually /is/ cheaper than holding it in a
> cheap city in Asia (say, Delhi or Mumbai)? And then I don't mean
It's indeed a pity that things were not announced sooner and better, but
the whole point of the new system is to decide earlier and waste less
volunteer time/nerves. If we dislike having losers, let's design a
system where there are no losers instead of asking that other people be
the losers.
But will there be fewer losers and less wasted effort under the continental
rotation system? Under the set continent rotation system it won't be possible
to bid one year, learn some lessons and bid the following year. You might get
some overlap between bid teams three years apart, but I
Did you also consider the hotel costs etc in this calculation? I recall
that catering and hotel costs in India were so much cheaper that it
balanced out the additional flight costs for the chapters meeting - not sur
ehow that would work oout on this scale though.
Either way, it would be
OK, great that you like it - but what is your argument for it? I get the
arguments for measuring distance in flight cost rather than time, and I get
the reasoning that conferences shouldn't be too close together. But why
should a conference in China disqualify Australia? Or why should London
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Lodewijk wrote:
> ..
> as a side note, of course I strongly support the regional conferences, and I
> am thrilled to see that the WikiArabia conference is seeing a second
> edition!
When looking for parts of a new process for Wikimania
very irony of all of this is that the Australian chapter had scheduled a
national-semi regional conference this past weekend but was that abandoned
when the funding request was decline
On 7 October 2015 at 08:11, John Mark Vandenberg wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 7:57 AM,
015-10-06 9:12 GMT+02:00 WereSpielChequers :
> But will there be fewer losers and less wasted effort under the continental
> rotation system?
IMHO yes. It is better to be 100% sure that a location WILL be chosen
for a particular event, instead of saying "well, we're
the idea is moving not just in distance but also in time that way travel
will be shared more equally the time shift creates new opportunities for
other people to access the event at low cost, ok 6 hours maybe too much but
o hours has a serious potential to introduce bias
the idea is to ensure
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Luca Martinelli
wrote:
> 015-10-06 9:12 GMT+02:00 WereSpielChequers :
>
> Also, I want to make a direct reference to the Manila 2016 Committee:
> if I have to think how should they feel right now after the
10 matches
Mail list logo