On 22 August 2012 22:39, Kim Bruning k...@bruning.xs4all.nl wrote:
For those interested, a quick reminder:
The travel guide RFC will (soft) close in 1 hour, 17 minutes as of the
moment this mail is sent. (At 0:00, 23 August 2012 (UTC))
I see none of the issues raised were really addressed.
Another spam filled, little populated, project then.
*sigh*
Tom
On 23 August 2012 11:53, Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk wrote:
On 22 August 2012 22:39, Kim Bruning k...@bruning.xs4all.nl wrote:
For those interested, a quick
On Aug 22, 2012, at 9:31 AM, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 9:14 AM, birgitte...@yahoo.com wrote:
Now clearly being able to judge that X is a utilitarian work is the more
normal problem with
On Aug 22, 2012, at 9:22 AM, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 9:14 AM, birgitte...@yahoo.com wrote:
I really doubt non-artistic works are copyrighted as a general rule anywhere
I'm not sure what you mean by non-artistic, but if you mean purely
utilitarian, as
On Aug 22, 2012, at 4:41 PM, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Todd Allen toddmal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 8:20 AM, birgitte...@yahoo.com wrote:
I believe artistic/non-artistic is accurate for images. Technically it is
artistic, literary, dramatic,
or musical works.
Well, I think that's an abuse of the term artistic. The job of a
photojournalist, for instance, is to
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:49 PM, birgitte...@yahoo.com wrote:
To reword what I said before the vast majority of X-ray images in existence
are diagnostic
images. There is no reason at all to purposefully search out X-rays that
might land in some
grey area.
One problem with that is that the
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
And many others were designed, like the X-ray image, to objectively
depict reality.
In fact, in theory, almost all the images in an encyclopedia should be
of this type (I say almost because there will also be images which
are
Most of the issues where addressed. And they only way to determine if many
of the concerns hold water is to simply try it. A travel guide will likely
be heavily read and edited.
As a comparison their are an approximately an equal number of medical
articles on Wikipedia to travel articles. Yet the
And here's a very short note about the next steps:
The board is reviewing the RfC and its talk page over the next week.
We are going to share our thoughts with you soon on the RfC's talk
page. Please feel free to leave comments there, that's still possible
and will be read ;-)
Regards, Alice
On
On Aug 23, 2012, at 7:35 AM, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 8:20 AM, birgitte...@yahoo.com wrote:
Snip
And even if it is only the US, other countries would not recognize
copyright on diagnostic
images created in the US, which gives us at least the NASA
On Aug 23, 2012, at 8:05 AM, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:49 PM, birgitte...@yahoo.com wrote:
To reword what I said before the vast majority of X-ray images in existence
are diagnostic
images. There is no reason at all to purposefully search out X-rays
12 matches
Mail list logo
