Re: [Wikimedia-l] Most viewed articles of 2013, across languages

2014-01-01 Thread Gerard Meijssen
Hoi, Would it be possible to have it for all languages? Thanks, GerardM On 1 January 2014 20:26, phoebe ayers wrote: > I don't think this has been sent out yet: > http://tools.wmflabs.org/wikitrends/2013.html > > (thanks to Itzik for drawing my attention to it, and Johan for coding it > up

[Wikimedia-l] New year's plans for editor engagement

2014-01-01 Thread ENWP Pine
We had a good 2013 year for readership statistics, fundraising, website reliability, and many other metrics. We are continuing to have challenges with our editor population declining. Statistics are at http://reportcard.wmflabs.org. WMF discussed some of the research around these i

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Most viewed articles of 2013, across languages

2014-01-01 Thread Itzik Edri
And as I wrote on ComCom, this data can be (easy) opportunity for chapters to get a great press cover by sending the list (and short analytics) to reports in their country. Here is the press cover WMIL got yesterday: http://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-4471585,00.html http://www.calcalist.co.il

[Wikimedia-l] Most viewed articles of 2013, across languages

2014-01-01 Thread phoebe ayers
I don't think this has been sent out yet: http://tools.wmflabs.org/wikitrends/2013.html (thanks to Itzik for drawing my attention to it, and Johan for coding it up!) This is fascinating. It's interesting that some languages (like English) have lots of results that are likely people trying to get

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Copyright URAA trolls on Wikimedia Commons

2014-01-01 Thread ???
On 01/01/2014 11:33, Gerard Meijssen wrote: Hoi, What effective claim has been made against Kim Dotcom and, THAT is your argument. Thanks, GerardM The claim is that knowing that items were copyright violations, they waited until a DMCA takedown came in before removing a link. Additional

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Copyright URAA trolls on Wikimedia Commons

2014-01-01 Thread Thomas Morton
Well not to get into a whole seperate discussion; but from emails recovered by prosecutors it seems they knowingly violated the safe harbour provisions by claiming to copyright holders that they had no access to raw files, when in fact they did. Actually, that context does have relevance. To what

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Copyright URAA trolls on Wikimedia Commons

2014-01-01 Thread Gerard Meijssen
Hoi, What effective claim has been made against Kim Dotcom and, THAT is your argument. Thanks, GerardM On 1 January 2014 12:21, ??? wrote: > On 01/01/2014 07:41, Gerard Meijssen wrote: > >> Hoi, >> When you go the way of comparing to Kim Dotcom to make a point, you will >> have to recognise

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Copyright URAA trolls on Wikimedia Commons

2014-01-01 Thread ???
On 01/01/2014 07:41, Gerard Meijssen wrote: Hoi, When you go the way of comparing to Kim Dotcom to make a point, you will have to recognise that the government has been shown to act illegally. Consequently your argument is without real merit. Thanks, GerardM The first thing that is wro