On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 1:35 AM, rupert THURNER rupert.thur...@gmail.comwrote:
as i overrun my monthly limit of mails allowed on this list already,
and i do not want an unrelated discussion on a public mailing list,
this in private:
nathan, would you be so kind to invest a little bit more
On 3/22/2014 2:04 PM, Tim Landscheidt wrote:
Michael Snow wikipe...@frontier.com wrote:
As such, it seems clear that the donor in question is in the
best position to evaluate whether the funds achieved their
intended purpose. We don't really have good information in
this case to do that for
On 23/03/2014, Michael Snow wikipe...@frontier.com
There isn't a legitimate basis for evaluating how the funds are spent
other than A's desires and intentions. It's still a restricted gift, we
can't pretend that this is money from general fundraising and decide it
should have been spent in a
On 3/23/2014 1:08 AM, Fæ wrote:
On 23/03/2014, Michael Snow wikipe...@frontier.com
There isn't a legitimate basis for evaluating how the funds are spent
other than A's desires and intentions. It's still a restricted gift, we
can't pretend that this is money from general fundraising and decide
Are charities in the UK prohibited from accepting donations to which any
form of restriction is attached?
No. It can be quite common.
On 23 Mar 2014 08:33, Michael Snow wikipe...@frontier.com wrote:
On 3/23/2014 1:08 AM, Fæ wrote:
On 23/03/2014, Michael Snow wikipe...@frontier.com
There
On 23 March 2014 08:32, Michael Snow wikipe...@frontier.com wrote:
On 3/23/2014 1:08 AM, Fæ wrote:
On 23/03/2014, Michael Snow wikipe...@frontier.com
There isn't a legitimate basis for evaluating how the funds are spent
other than A's desires and intentions. It's still a restricted gift, we
I just wanted to chime in here to say that, at least in a vacuum, I found
Rupert's e-mail to be highly inappropriate and I found Nathan's response
to it to be wholly appropriate.
Rupert, I hope to never see a repeat of this incident, in which you
attempt to badger a list participant and Wikimedia
Wait, are we in kindergarden? I think Rupert's email was sent off-list,
so basically there is no need to bring it up to the list, regardless how
related it is to the thread. Private discussions between two people
should remain that, _private_, no?
I just don't get it.
M.
El 23/03/2014 04:33
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 6:59 AM, Marc A. Pelletier m...@uberbox.org wrote:
On 03/22/2014 02:45 PM, Russavia wrote:
It's already been established that there is massive copyvio in there,
and I think it is absolutely unacceptable for a copyvio to still be in
this article under the circumstances.
On 2 January 2014 04:24, James Forrester jdforres...@gmail.com wrote:
Everyone,
I would like to invite submissions[0] proposing presentations, panels,
tutorials and workshops for Wikimania 2014 in London this coming August.
Note that the deadline is the end of March; we hope to have final
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Carlos M. Colina
ma...@wikimedia.org.vewrote:
Wait, are we in kindergarden? I think Rupert's email was sent off-list, so
basically there is no need to bring it up to the list, regardless how
related it is to the thread. Private discussions between two people
Before we start thinking about the implications for WiR in general or WMF's
relationship with Stanton, I think we should focus on establishing the facts of
what happened here. After we have a good understanding of the facts we can
discuss the implications.
I'm still waiting for Arbcom to get
With respect to Sandole's editing
of the article on [[Opposition to military action against Iran]]
The edit listed in this thread
*
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Opposition_to_military_action_against_Irandiff=514822741oldid=514817891
by itself would seem to show undue emphasis on
Interview: Nate Ott: the writer behind 71 articles in the English Wikipedia's
largest-ever good topic
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2014-03-19/Interview
Forum: Wikimedia Commons mission: free media for the world or only Wikimedia
projects?
Definitely a cultural thing -I still don't understand why someone can feel
intimidated or harassed by that e-mailI'd better not go into details
because it can be understood as I'm attacking an ethnic/linguistic group of
wikimedians :-)
Sent from Samsung Mobile
Original message
15 matches
Mail list logo
