Nice idea. The more participation, the better.
Nathan, 24/04/2014 22:46:
an entity
competing with the WMF for funding from the same pool
But no such entity exists. Problem solved.
Nemo
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Thanks Tilman. I asked a question on the Annual Plan talk page that's relevant
here as well,
and anyone who knows the answer can respond, especially while Anasuya is busy.
Can
someone explain the difference between the functions of the LE and PED groups,
and is
there a plan to integrate them?
Hi,
The report covering Wikimedia engineering activities in March 2014 is now
available.
Wiki version:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_engineering_report/2014/March
Blog version:
http://blog.wikimedia.org/2014/04/18/engineering-report-march-2014/
We're also proposing a shorter, simpler
Hi all,
One thing we forgot to mention is that the FDC staff will still be doing the
financial and other quantitative data analysis, since this is a quantitative
analysis that is based on public data and standard calculations. WMDE (and
anyone else) are invited to point out any discrepancies
Hi Risker,
Thanks for your thoughts.
Instead I suggest that the FDC seek authorization from the Board for an
independent third party review if it feels that there is not the necessary
ability for the FDC to produce its own assessment.
I'm personally curious to know whether you have any
