On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 11:13 AM, David Gerard wrote:
> "INFOGALACTIC: an online encyclopedia without bias or thought police"
>
> Home page: http://infogalactic.com/info/Main_Page
> Announcement: http://voxday.blogspot.com/2016/10/project-big-fork-
> infogalactic.html
>
You can simply leave a warning on sandboxes and drafts, or a "NOINDEX"
template. And rejected content can also stay there, it just can't go to ns0 at
least for a while. I mean if I open a sandbox or draft, write a description of
something below notability in many cases it's not erased and/or
One (unrealistic?) brainchild of me is that Wikipedia should be have as
a key element, a reliability class set on all articles, say A-F, where
today's articles would mainly be C (no issues) and D (issues exist).
That articles with a A or B class would require only Trusted user
account to edit,
trivia makes me thinks about "wikia" platforms and similar. I also read
discussions where people promoted a bigger interactions with wikia. They
suggested for example that a iink at the end of the pages of toons or series to
wikia webpages would be not so bad, even if it is not 100% reliable
On Wed, 12 Oct 2016, Peter Southwood wrote:
I agree.
There is a lot of information that could be provided for and by people who are interested in trivia (I am not using the term derogatively - just couldn’t think of a better one).
Cheers,
P
The subject-specific Wikia wikis seem to
I agree.
There is a lot of information that could be provided for and by people who are
interested in trivia (I am not using the term derogatively - just couldn’t
think of a better one).
Cheers,
P
-Original Message-
From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On
I agree with Anders. About the issue of weak/bad/irrelevant/border-line content
management. I don't care about that specific project although I do support
plurality in any case.
But "not wasting" material and HRs is a key issue. For all platforms. At the
moment I would strongly encourage at
Wikitrivia?
Cheers,
P
-Original Message-
From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of
Anders Wennersten
Sent: Tuesday, 11 October 2016 12:16 PM
To: wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] A new Wikipedia fork: InfoGalactic
I think