For those who missed it in the 10th footnote, this is the link to spread:
https://blog.wikimedia.org/2017/05/23/wikimedia-nsa-appeal-standing/
- d.
On 23 May 2017 at 23:00, James Buatti wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
>
>
> The Foundation is pleased to announce an update
Hello everybody,
The Foundation is pleased to announce an update in Wikimedia Foundation v.
National Security Agency,[1] our challenge to the U.S. National Security
Agency’s “Upstream”[2] mass surveillance practices. We filed[3] the suit
back in March 2015 to protect the privacy and free
Welcome to the new / old trustees. I'm thankful for your continued service
to the movement.
Let's turn our attention toward the future and work together for the
benefit of the movement.
Warmly,
/a
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Dariusz Jemielniak
wrote:
> To be fair,
To be fair, while I opposed THIS particular removal from the Board, I think
the Board SHOULD have the right to expel people who are perceived as
disruptive, uncooperative, or not fulfilling their fiduciary duties well.
Such cases should be rare, and exceptionally well grounded and explained
Instead of blaming people, I blame the idea that board members should ever
be ejected if they have lost the trust or confidence of other board
members, or because other members feel uncomfortable working with them, or
because they may choose to withhold or be more forthcoming with information
than
+1 :-)
The elected candidates are ideal, making me feel confident that the
values and aspirations of the wider Wikimedia volunteer community will
be well represented in the coming year.
As previously mentioned, Alice and Jimmy were the main political
players in excluding Doc James from board
I normally hate +1s, but I want to congratulate Doc James on his
reappointment to the board. I hope we've all learned from his previous
term, and can work together to benefit the movement.
With love,
One of your list administrators, who would rather not have to deal with
fiascos.
On May 23,