On 22 September 2017 at 18:24, James Heilman wrote:
> We know that a sizable proportion of articles
> about people are paid for by the individual themselves or their
> representative.
We do? How? And what size is that "sizable proportion"?
--
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
Yes very interesting, if only to illustrate how difficult it is to get this
information reliably. It is also interesting to see those charts dating to
the days before Wikidata. One problem with using these stats is that pretty
much everything is a moving target. Yes there is a larger gap at the
An interesting paper. We know that a sizable proportion of articles
about people are paid for by the individual themselves or their
representative.
I just looked at the gender of all articles created by this sock
involved in undisclosed paid editing
Hi all,
One of the members from Wikimedia Chile, independently from the chapter and
before he became a member, was directly involved in the development of the
following article, that adress the gender inequality (or gender bias), and
which gives the title to the email:
Thank you, Zach, Hasive, Tanweer and others :)
I would like to thank the entire Odia community and also Asaf for playing a
major role in this initiative :)
---
*Sailesh Patnaik* "*ଶୈଳେଶ ପଟ୍ଟନାୟକ "*
Community Advocate, Access To Knowledge Program
Centre for Internet and Society
Phone:
Thank you Adele and Yongmin. I'll ask Barbara to clarify next time we chat.
On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 at 12:49 am, Yongmin H. wrote:
> I tried quite a lot (around 10 times) and succeded to get one saying
> ‘here’s something I found from Wikipedia.’ I have it recorded, but
>
Great news indeed. Thank you Sailesh and other members of the Odia
community who worked on this!
On Thursday, September 21, 2017, Nurunnaby Hasive wrote:
> Wow! Congratulations!
>
>
>
> Hasive
>
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:03 AM, Zachary McCune