[Wikimedia-l] Update: Next steps on Movement Strategy (Phase II)

Dear all, I am excited to provide some updates on the movement strategy process. After a break for re-energizing after phase 1 (and a focus on some internal priorities at the Foundation, such as annual planning), we are now about to kick off the next phase of our work. In Phase I, we agreed upon

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Ask Amazon, Apple, Google, and Microsoft to state wiki article source dates in voice?

> That's a completely different and unrelated issue to the thread YOU stated. The issues share the commonalities of user friendliness/design and a Foundation decision on the question of presentation vs. editor attraction and retention. > Please stick to the topic at hand or start a new thread.

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Ask Amazon, Apple, Google, and Microsoft to state wiki article source dates in voice?

That's a completely different and unrelated issue to the thread YOU stated. Whilst I'm impressed at your willingness to hijack your own thread to refer to a completely unrelated topic after only one response, it is unsurprising and I'm personally bored of it. Please stick to the topic at hand or

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Ask Amazon, Apple, Google, and Microsoft to state wiki article source dates in voice?

> I don't think it's particularly user/design friendly How does the Foundation choose between presentation advantages for commercial users, and advantages for attracting and retaining editors? Is the request to try the word "edit" instead of a pencil icon on mobile a good example of the

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Ask Amazon, Apple, Google, and Microsoft to state wiki article source dates in voice?

I don't think it's particularly user/design friendly Seddon On Wed, 7 Mar 2018, 16:22 James Salsman, wrote: > I wanted to share this because it's pertinent to issues with large > companies using our information without complying with the license > terms: > > >