As I see it the strategy process is run for the functionaries in the
movement and by them. People with focus on contributing to the projects
are not involved, when volunteers is mentioned it is mostly people
running worskhops for beginners etc, a kind of semi functionaries, not
the hard core
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 9:16 PM, David Cuenca Tudela
wrote:
>
> I don't like to think in drastic terms like these because it fails to
> recognize the amount of good will that has been poured into the process and
> the selection of participants by the Strategy team. It is perhaps more
>
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 1:34 PM Paulo Santos Perneta <
paulospern...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I fail to understand why, among the dozens of people
> chosen to be part of the Working Groups, there's not a single one that can
> be identified as a representative of that community.
>
Well, you can slice
Hello David,
> I do not agree that there should be speakers of all languages in the
working groups. The language a person speaks says nothing about the ideas
they support. There are monolingual English speakers that appreciate the
value of having multilingualism play a prominent role in the
> The messages about our application process that we ran in June were not
distributed directly to the broad variety of project communities. Our focus
was indeed on the organized part of the movement, and then to work with the
Working Groups on getting the message to the project communities and to
