Kaya
When we look at number we to interpret them in ways that the numbers
themselves don't.
Think about this 40% that think the the policies need 'quite a bit of
improvement' but that doesnt tell us if it because the policy failed to
protect them. More importantly it also doesn't say if was the
Thanks Tito, Pete and Shani...
There is a formal comment period open until May 6. The U.S. government is
accepting letters or briefs from any individual or organization.
I've shared my own in the hopes others will do something similar.
If it hasn't already, the Wikimedia Foundation's Research
You can see all of our recent Wikipedia Weekly Network episodes here, and
can subscribe to us on YouTube, please do because when we get 100
subscribers, we get a non-obnoxious url:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCa5oYsCabGo7XwwKGqo7Qcw/videos
100th subscriber gets a free stub from me!
Thanks,
Perfect statement: only one correction: you need to negate the following
phrase...
And, if they are *un*able to read and cite it...
If every country would vote an equivalent law for Free Knowledge, the world
would become a better place to live...
-- Geert Van Pamel
We within the Wikimedia movement have a open access journal without any
publication fees. https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_User_Group There
are also other platinum open access publishers.
James
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 2:52 PM Yaroslav Blanter wrote:
> As an actively publishing
As an actively publishing researcher, I just know that mandating open
access publishing would mean that the author pays the (huge) publication
fee rather than the library pays the subscription. In an ideal world, the
universities would refund the fees, and will get subsidy from the
governments, In
Jake, well written and nicely put.
Is this online somewhere, where we can share it further?
Best,
Shani.
---
*Shani Evenstein Sigalov*
* Lecturer, Tel Aviv University.
* EdTech Innovation Strategist, NY/American Medical Program, Sackler School
of
Jake,
How can we most effectively support your excellent effort with this?
-Pete
--
Pete Forsyth
User:Peteforsyth on Meta, English Wikisource, English Wikipedia, etc.
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 1:22 PM Tito Dutta wrote:
> Hello,
> Very well-written and well-supported by statistics. Thanks for
Hello,
Very well-written and well-supported by statistics. Thanks for sharing.
Regards.
User:Titodutta
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020, 1:41 AM Jake Orlowitz wrote:
> My Letter to the U.S. Office for Science and Technology Policy regarding a
> proposal for federally mandate open access to publicly-funded
My Letter to the U.S. Office for Science and Technology Policy regarding a
proposal for federally mandate open access to publicly-funded research...
---
Wikipedia is one of the ten most popular websites in the world. Each month
200,000 editors improve over 6 million articles. This vital public
One of the advantages of this project is that the best of each Wikipedia can be
used, allowing smaller Wikipedias to concentrate on topics of local interest
and importance which are not in the other language wikipedias, and these can be
used in the major wikipedias, expanding their diversity if
Hi Pine,
I don't think a global commitee would be the right place - stewards are
currently filling this gap involuntarily, and it seems extremely difficult
to judge situations on a local project properly (the Azerbaijani case might
come to mind here).
For me the ideal version of a universal CoC
Thank you, Scott,
this is a great and important question. I go into more detail about the
changes to the incentives structures for the contributors in the
Wikipedia @ 20 essay here:
https://wikipedia20.pubpub.org/pub/vyf7ksah
In short: it relies heavily on getting the user experience just
13 matches
Mail list logo
