Re: [Wikimedia-l] New essay on the ambiguity of NC licenses

On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 3:52 PM Samuel Klein wrote: > I don't think we should mix NC with free-knowledge licenses . > I do absolutely think we should maintain an archive, visible to the public > with at most a simple hoop to jump through, of material that is offered to > us in any legal way but no

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Movement Strategy: Feedback requested on draft outline of Transition events

Bonjour à tous, Ceci est une mise à jour concernant les avancements de la Stratégie du Mouvement et de la conception des événements de transition. Le groupe de design de la transition [1] a débattu au cours du

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wikimedia Announcements] Announcing a new Wikimedia project: Abstract Wikipedia

Scott, thank you for raising this really important issue, and I whole-heartedly agree. Since I heard of Ibram X. Kendi's argument to not just be not racist but rather be actively anti-racist, I thought a lot about it (I have a long essay trying to sort my thoughts on that, but I am not sure my voi

[Wikimedia-l] Movement Strategy: Feedback requested on draft outline of Transition events

Hi everyone, This is an update regarding the progress of the Movement Strategy and the design of the transition events. The Transition Design Group [1] has over the past month been discussing how to create eve

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wikimedia Announcements] Announcing a new Wikimedia project: Abstract Wikipedia

If "anti-classist" is your way of writing "empowering the less-powerful", then sure. As the rest of my email indicates, I'm choosing to focus on language and language groups, since that's the most direct relation to the output and input technologies of Abstract Wikimedia. Obviously there is no di