[Wikimedia-l] Re: Join the new Movement Strategy Forum community review

Ceill, I am a big fan of having 'one front door' for people that are trying to find answers to questions. Having the front door in another building, with another technology, and once they are in we say them that our building is the other one, the one that is falling down (but don't visit the

[Wikimedia-l] Re: Join the new Movement Strategy Forum community review

Hi, First: I am a big fan of having 'one front door' for people that are trying to find answers to questions they do not know where to ask (last year's movement communications insights on this ). I think a forum,

[Wikimedia-l] Re: Join the new Movement Strategy Forum community review

Hi Tgr :) Of course you've been involved in Discourse administration as much as anyone. > Our community's hostility to experiments is one of the biggest obstacles > to adaptation and addressing long-present problems > That seems unfair. Please reconsider. (your opinion carries a lot of weight

[Wikimedia-l] Re: Join the new Movement Strategy Forum community review

Hi Mike, Yes, on-wiki replies are fine and the organizers of the election will contact you to clarify the details. We will find a fix to the problem of the content license on the forum. Thank you for pointing this out. About features, this is what the election organizers want to try out: * Let

[Wikimedia-l] Re: Join the new Movement Strategy Forum community review

No single feature in this off-wiki experiment created in order to make MediaWiki more obsolete cab't be achieved at Meta now. No one. If there's something that should be included in Meta and Discourse has, then I would like to remember that we have more than 100 million USD in a giant money pool