On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 4:28 AM Erik Moeller wrote:
> If you want to impose _additional restrictions_ on a person for stuff
> they download from you, that actually requires proactive agreement
> from the user to those restrictions at the time they download the
> thing.
>
> If you don't obtain
Den tors 30 mars 2023 kl 02:33 skrev Lauren Worden :
>
> Is the BLOOM RAIL license [
> https://huggingface.co/spaces/bigscience/license ] proprietary?
>
Yes. The common definition is that if it is not open source, it is
proprietary. But you don't need to take my word for it.
> So I expect the
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 1:49 PM Jan Ainali wrote:
> On the contrary, I think it is important to, as early as possible, deter all
> these attempts
> to weaken the concept of "open" and that we as a movement need to take a hard
> stance
> against them.
I agree with Jan on this. Licenses are the
Hi,
>> My understanding is that is not proprietary, and the only reason it
doesn't qualify for Open Source Initiative approval is because of these use
restrictions:
>
> To generate or disseminate information or content, in any context (e.g.
posts, articles, tweets, chatbots or other kinds of
I find it rather telling that the negative responses while recorded that
there is no indication of plans to explore or address these concerns. At
the very least a tokinistic inclusion in the email to say the WMF through
the Universal Code of Conduct project team will continue to address the
My Fellow Wikimedians,
Thanks you very much for your kind interest in submitting program
proposals. Program submissions officially closed at 29 March 2023 at 13:59
UTC.
We received 594 program submissions and we will remove the spam submissions
accordingly. Program subcommittee *may* announce
