can that are posed about the team?s work to
>>>> talktohumanrig...@wikimedia.org. Depending on the case,the human rights
>>>> team may provide ways to help or avenues to connect with organizations
>>>> who are supporting. They may also be able to advise when silen
Dear WMF Human Rights Team:
I would like some clarification on your statement below. In
particular, does your stated approach allow you to follow the best
practices described at
https://freedomhouse.org/2023/summit-for-democracy-political-prisoners
to, e.g., "meet regularly with family members of
The only specific and non-contradictory complaints about Wikipedia
bias I can find on
https://justapedia.org/wiki/Justapedia:Justapedia_Foundation are
climate change and COVID-19, which are areas in which I think
Wikipedia excels. The complaints about politics go in both directions.
Perhaps Atsme
s and LLMs.
>
> On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 12:12 PM Lauren Worden
> wrote:
> [...]
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 1:20 AM Kimmo Virtanen
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Or, maybe just require an open disclosure of where the bot pulled from
>>
Has anyone tried telling the Google Search Console to index all the
Wikisource language domains? Presumably a Foundation sysadmin would
need to add the ownership verification tokens to do so:
https://search.google.com/search-console/welcome
-LW
On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 7:53 AM Dušan Kreheľ wrote:
Dušan, please see https://wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/4.0_upgrade_guidelines
> Upgrading from prior versions to 4.0
>
> * New content:
>
> ** Who will own the rights?
> *** If the publisher, then can simply apply 4.0 as specified above.
> *** If the contributors, then need need to require they
Can we have a "San Francisco Tea Party" telling the UK government that
Wikimedia projects would rather block access to the United Kingdom
than comply with their misguided requirements?
> -- Forwarded message -
> From:
> Date: Mon, May 15, 2023, 2:56 AM
> Subject: [Publicpolicy]
Really? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=WNBA_Finals=history
On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 3:19 AM Joseph Fox wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 11:05, Lauren Worden wrote:
>>
>> > user-editable cache of multimodal answers
>>
>> Apologies, but that's a
> user-editable cache of multimodal answers
Apologies, but that's a terrible idea. Who wants to edit keeping up to
date, for example, "teams currently in the playoffs"?
In any case, I feel obligated to share this with the list:
https://www.anthropic.com/index/100k-context-windows
Anthropic
Flo and Andreas,
Have you asked these questions to ask...@wikimedia.org?
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Community_Affairs_Committee/2023-05-18_Conversation_with_Trustees#Submit_your_questions
-LW
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 12:22 PM Florence Devouard wrote:
>
> Speaking of
On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 5:40 PM Erik Moeller wrote:
>
> I can't comment on the hardware requirements, but I would note that in
> addition to the llama.cpp repository
> (https://github.com/ggerganov/llama.cpp), which currently focuses on
> LLaMA/Alpaca, there are other efforts to reduce the
On Sat, Apr 1, 2023 at 10:18 PM rupert THURNER wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 1, 2023 at 11:36 PM Erik Moeller wrote:
> >
> > ... I am confident (based on, e.g., the recent
> > results with Alpaca: https://crfm.stanford.edu/2023/03/13/alpaca.html)
> > that the performance of smaller models will continue
Erik, I see your point now and agree with you. But doesn't it seem
like obtaining a perfect license is at present the enemy of the urgent
good of bringing a concerted effort to bear on problems that are
clearly detrimental to project integrity?
I haven't been able to tell whether any of the
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 4:28 AM Erik Moeller wrote:
> If you want to impose _additional restrictions_ on a person for stuff
> they download from you, that actually requires proactive agreement
> from the user to those restrictions at the time they download the
> thing.
>
> If you don't obtain
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 1:04 PM Felipe Schenone wrote:
>
> FYI, there's an open letter requesting a 6-month pause on AI development, [
> https://futureoflife.org/open-letter/pause-giant-ai-experiments/ ] with
> reasonable arguments (in my opinion) and signed by several big names too.
First, I
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 1:50 PM Jan Ainali wrote:
>
> I think it is important to, as early as possible, deter all these attempts to
> weaken the concept of "open" and that we as a movement need to take a hard
> stance against them.
> These proprietary licenses do not fit the spirit of sharing
.
>> And thank's a lot for organizing the meeting yesterday!
>>
>> Paulo
>>
>> Samuel Klein escreveu no dia quinta, 23/03/2023 à(s)
>> 21:11:
>>
>>> The Bau lab (that produced ROME) is great; see their update MEMIT
>>> https://memit.baulab.info scalin
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 12:20 PM Samuel Klein wrote:
> Thanks Yael and all for hosting this! A great conversation which we
> should revisit regularly.
>
Yes, I hope that this can be a (monthly?) regularly occurring event given
the current state of very substantial advancements and improvements
Google BARD, announced this week, also tries and fails to perform
attribution and verification:
https://old.reddit.com/r/Bard/comments/11yeegu/google_bard_claims_bard_has_already_been_shut/jd77wpo/
BARD also produces lengthy passages from its training data verbatim
without elicitation:
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 9:28 PM Kim Bruning via Wikimedia-l
wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 02:48:12AM -0700, Lauren Worden wrote:
> >
> > LLMs absolutely do encode a verbatim copy of their
> > training data, which can be produced intact with little effort.
>
&
On Sat, Mar 18, 2023 at 3:49 PM Erik Moeller wrote:
>
> ...With image-generating models like Stable Diffusion, it's been found
> that the models sometimes generate output nearly indistinguishable
> from source material [1]. I don't know if similar studies have been
> undertaken for
21 matches
Mail list logo
