Gabriele, indicated we shouldn't use the current methodology unless they have
very good alternatives - but the same applies to stopping it.
We don't have the capacity to handle a big bulk increase in pending changes as
proposed by gbfv on en-wiki and presumably others as well - and making
This is a proposal that would need to be included in next year's funding plan.
It also would involve an obligation for the other teams within the Foundation.
**Part 1: Funding redistribution and Big Ticket team**
This year, we (that is, the WMF using movement funds) spent a huge amount of
money
here. Surely the reasoning for each bit of content and failure to publicly
consult are already known? So why the lag time?
Yours,
Richard (Nosebagbear)
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines at:
https://meta.wik
d a chance to become highly
invested in an actual draft language.
*Richard (Nosebagbear)*
Unless otherwise stated within this email, any Movement Charter viewpoints
expressed represent my own position(s), and *not* the aggregate judgement
of the MCDC.
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 at 13:09,
wrote:
> S
the title - didn't want to change
this one *now* as I don't know if that would split the thread. Happy for
someone to change to an appropriate title.
*Richard (Nosebagbear)*
Unless otherwise stated within this email, any Movement Charter viewpoints
expressed represent my own position(s
-RfC. Please provide the reasoning for this process.
*Richard (Nosebagbear)*
Unless otherwise stated within this email, any Movement Charter viewpoints
expressed represent my own position(s), and *not* the aggregate judgement
of the MCDC.
On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 21:13,
wrote:
> Send Wikimedia-l m
questions!) the actual next needs MORE time to review than the aspects
already there, not less.
Yours,
Nosebagbear
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Dear Guillame, as well as others who may share his position:
I write as a partial rebuttal to a number of points within your response.
"In it, we estimated that coming closer to our vision would probably
require an annual budget for the movement in the vicinity of a billion
dollar"
Much of this
acets in this post - thank you for reading, and I
look forward to answers handling all of these concerns, not merely a
section.
Cheers,
Nosebagbear
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.or
and awareness of community
values that anyone operating in such a significant consulting role in the most
critical field of discussions the movement has had in a decade.
Yours,
Nosebagbear
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wi
10 matches
Mail list logo
