Hello,
Could you provide me relevant links so I may understand this topic?
While I have superficiel knowledge of SOPA and PIPA, I have no idea what
CFAAA and CALEA are.
Le 2013-04-14 01:25, James Salsman a écrit :
Jan-Bart,
I reserve the right to speak with anyone at any time on any
Le 2013-04-14 02:44, Marc A. Pelletier a écrit :
On 04/13/2013 07:25 PM, James Salsman wrote:
In
short, the CFAA amendments alone would likely cost readers, editors,
and the Foundation more than 500 times as much as SOPA or PIPA could
have cost, under what I believe is a very reasonable set of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[replies inline with quoted message(s)]
On 4/15/2013 12:31 AM, Mathieu Stumpf wrote:
Le 2013-04-14 02:44, Marc A. Pelletier a écrit :
{{cn}}
-- Marc
Could you tell me what is {{cn}} standing for, please?
{{cn}}
Le 2013-04-15 09:39, FastLizard4 a écrit :
{{cn}} https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Cn is the template on
the English Wikipedia that inserts the little [citation needed]
text.
So, in other words, Marc is asking for James to provide sources to
back
up his (James') claim.
- --
Ok, thank
Mathieu: CFAA is the federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, which
criminalizes among other things unauthorized access or exceeding authorized
access of a protected system, and is found at 18 U.S.C. 1030.
CALEA is the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act, which is a
federal wiretapping
Hi Garfield,
Would you please find out how much the CFAA and CALEA amendements
would be expected to cost readers, editors, and the Foundation
compared to what SOPA or PIPA would have cost if they had passed, and
let the wikimedia-l and advocacy advisors lists know?
Best regards,
James Salsman
Hey James
So while we have actively started looking for a new ED I am happy to report
that Sue is still on the job !
Which means you do not have to fill in for the position and tell Garfield what
to do :)
On a more realistic tone: my gut feeling is that you are asking an impossible
question
Jan-Bart,
I reserve the right to speak with anyone at any time on any subject.
Thank you for your reply:
my gut feeling is that you are asking an impossible question (and aware of
this) and I assume that Garfield
has much better things to do, but I guess if Sue wants to sound time on this,
On 04/13/2013 07:25 PM, James Salsman wrote:
In
short, the CFAA amendments alone would likely cost readers, editors,
and the Foundation more than 500 times as much as SOPA or PIPA could
have cost, under what I believe is a very reasonable set of
assumptions.
{{cn}}
-- Marc
Marc Pelletier wrote:
On 04/13/2013 07:25 PM, James Salsman wrote:
In short, the CFAA amendments alone would likely cost readers, editors,
and the Foundation more than 500 times as much as SOPA or PIPA could
have cost, under what I believe is a very reasonable set of assumptions.
{{cn}}
10 matches
Mail list logo
