Happy to help. :-)
Dan
On 18 April 2015 at 13:56, Aleksey Bilogur
wrote:
> Thanks for the help, all.
>
> On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Dan Garry wrote:
>
> > On 18 April 2015 at 13:27, Ricordisamoa
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > IANAL, but I know for sure that trademark status and copyright status
Thanks for the help, all.
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Dan Garry wrote:
> On 18 April 2015 at 13:27, Ricordisamoa
> wrote:
> >
> > IANAL, but I know for sure that trademark status and copyright status are
> > different things. And this thread is definitely asking for the latter...
>
>
> Wel
On 18 April 2015 at 13:27, Ricordisamoa
wrote:
>
> IANAL, but I know for sure that trademark status and copyright status are
> different things. And this thread is definitely asking for the latter...
Well, I've given the answer to both questions now. Is there some other
question you need help wi
Il 18/04/2015 21:01, Dan Garry ha scritto:
On 18 April 2015 at 11:32, Aleksey Bilogur
wrote:
I want to use it to illustrate something I'm building in the Wikipedia
domain on the en-wiki, so I'd like to know this for sure. Who's a good
person to ask; or, will they come here instead? :)
I though
Hi everyone,
I've made an attempt to correct the licensing, as the W is a Wikimedia
trademark. Feel free to assist if I've made any mistakes.
Heather
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 12:10 PM, James Alexander
wrote:
> The WMF Logos are now all or almost all released under cc-by-sa 3.0 now as
> well ra
The WMF Logos are now all or almost all released under cc-by-sa 3.0 now as
well rather then All Rights Reserved. I think you should be fine but if you
want to be double sure you can email tradema...@wikimedia.org with what
you're thinking and they are very good at getting back to you.
James Alexan
On 18 April 2015 at 11:32, Aleksey Bilogur
wrote:
> I want to use it to illustrate something I'm building in the Wikipedia
> domain on the en-wiki, so I'd like to know this for sure. Who's a good
> person to ask; or, will they come here instead? :)
>
> I thought that WMF logos can be used freely
I want to use it to illustrate something I'm building in the Wikipedia
domain on the en-wiki, so I'd like to know this for sure. Who's a good
person to ask; or, will they come here instead? :)
I thought that WMF logos can be used freely within the projects, however
that's arranged legally, and tho
I doubt this logo crosses the originality threshold. The logo is probably
public domain. That said, it's definitely a trademark of the Wikimedia
Foundation, and should be marked as such.
Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer. :-)
Dan
On 18 April 2015 at 08:42, Aleksey Bilogur
wrote:
> Hello, what is t
Most logos are copyrighted even from the WMF, for legal reasons. However
this particular icon is well below the copyright threshold, and thus is not
copyrightable.
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Aleksey Bilogur wrote:
> Hello, what is the copyright status of the application icon for Wikipedia
Hello, what is the copyright status of the application icon for Wikipedia
mobile applications? This one, specifically, as far as I can tell:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:WikipediaMobileAppLogo.png
The copyright information lists it as being fair use, but that seems
strange to me; is this ac
11 matches
Mail list logo
