Hi all,
OK, I've been reading this plus the emails that I got off-list. It seems
that there are a lot of diverse ideas and priorities, and probably the best
way to gather and prioritize them is through a strategic planning process
somewhat like what WMF and the community did in the last time aroun
On 07/14/2014 01:25 PM, Fæ wrote:
> Yes, some people may get scholarships to travel to Wikimania or other
> conferences, however my understanding is that this would be limited to
> those presenting.
Scholarships are also made available to attendees, specifically to allow
those who would not otherw
On 07/14/2014 10:39 AM, Martijn Hoekstra wrote:
> I still
> believe, that the success of English Wikipedia hinges on the ability of the
> community to generate content, and that that's the absolutely most
> important part of English Wikipedia - all else, including consumption by
> end users - follo
On 14/07/2014, Jane Darnell wrote:
> Well maybe all of you are independently wealthy, have laptop and and will
> travel, but as I see it, for the rest of us, without travel budget
> facilitated by WMF and chapters, I don't see how we can achieve meetups to
> do any brainstorming at all. And poring
I'm too lazy to read all above and below but I think we might try.
Wikicommunities blackouted wikis protest to some political laws in some
countries which is beyond not-a-soapbox pillar but they can't stand
WMF's pressure. Should be vice versa IMHO.
--Base
14.07.2014 10:25, Pine W написав(ла):
Well maybe all of you are independently wealthy, have laptop and and will
travel, but as I see it, for the rest of us, without travel budget
facilitated by WMF and chapters, I don't see how we can achieve meetups to
do any brainstorming at all. And poring over lists of ideas tucked away in
the rece
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Pine W wrote:
> Hi community members,
>
> I'm wondering how many people might be interested in having an IRC meeting
> regarding the community's relationship to WMF and potentially developing
> our own strategic plan that would be independent of WMF. In the past f
>
>
>
> I expect this would be an interesting meeting if people are interested in
> participating, and I hope that we would brainstorm some ideas about how we
> want to move forward on all of these questions and others if we have time.
>
Hi Pine,
I think it would be much more productive to think
Pine,
We need more of
- decentralized development so that people can write new gadgets and extensions
easier like firefox jetpack for example.. Each project needs its own editing
and feedback tools that it would happily design on wiki in collaborative fashion
- means to encourage more content
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 3:25 AM, Pine W wrote:
> Hi community members,
>
> I'm wondering how many people might be interested in having an IRC meeting
> regarding the community's relationship to WMF and potentially developing
> our own strategic plan that would be independent of WMF. In the past f
Balázs Viczián, 14/07/2014 13:53:
> Imo all of the below and about 70-80% of the topics previously brough up in
> this thread can be solved/actioned/discussed/amended/etc by the community
So you're confirming that they're on topic for the proposal :) which was
«Perhaps it's time that we in the com
On 14/07/2014, Jane Darnell wrote:
> Balazs,
> It's interesting that you feel that way, because I disagree entirely. Out
> of curiosity, have you ever met another Wikipedian in real life, and do you
> feel that meet-ups are beneficial to the movement?
> Jane
Jane,
"Without a single person involv
Balazs,
It's interesting that you feel that way, because I disagree entirely. Out
of curiosity, have you ever met another Wikipedian in real life, and do you
feel that meet-ups are beneficial to the movement?
Jane
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Balázs Viczián wrote:
> Bear in mind WikiPedia =
Bear in mind WikiPedia =/= WikiMedia.
Imo all of the below and about 70-80% of the topics previously brough up in
this thread can be solved/actioned/discussed/amended/etc by the community
solely through Village Pump (or other relevant forums) without a single
person involved (ever) from WMF or any
I am interested in community strategy to tackle such things as
1) exposing missing, confusing, or outdated local policies by using policy
comparisons cross-wiki
2) handling multi-language issues such as highlighting article-for-deletion
discussions for each language in which the article exists, not
I am interested in community strategy but have very different topics in mind
*how should we handle the 50-100 projects that today in practice are
dead. They are open for anyone (besides vandals that already infest
these) to hi-jack
*how should we handle the 5-10 projects that are already hi-jack
On 14/07/14 17:25, Pine W wrote:
Hi community members,
Topics of possible discussion regarding our relationship with WMF:
1. Strategic options, such as finding alternative organizations to WMF for
hosting Wikimedia sites or creating a new hosting organization that is
aligned with community
Hi community members,
I'm wondering how many people might be interested in having an IRC meeting
regarding the community's relationship to WMF and potentially developing
our own strategic plan that would be independent of WMF. In the past few
days I've heard some defense of WMF but mainly criticis
18 matches
Mail list logo