Hi Victoria,
It appears you misread the sentence in question. Smallbones was talking
about a hypothetical future in which the Russian government might block
both Wikipedia and VPNs. This would result in the articles being written by
Ukrainians, and given that Ruviki copies most of its content
Let me clear it a bit. The only ones who git blocked were Vladimir Medeyko and
few others involved in creating of Russian Wikipedia clone. For example, all of
NWR-Hist User group is still active in various projects while most of its
members are still in Russia.
There were some discussions on
No they are not blocked. So saying that it's Ukrainians and not Russians -
including those that live in Russia - who edit articles about the war
supports the case for blocking Russian Wikipedia.
I think while writing on sensitive topics like this the authors should fact
check first, write later.
Victoria,
Can you explain what the issue is? It is not obvious to me what hoax you
are seeing. People in Russia are blocked from editing Wikipedia, are they
not?
There is a comment section at the bottom of that article. I encourage you
to post corrections.
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 4:53 AM
Hello Andreas,
>In the media: Deadnames on the French Wikipedia, and a duel between
Russian wikis
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2024-05-16/In_the_media
It's sad to see the Signpost perpetuating the hoax that "[Russian
Wikipedia] articles on the Russian invasion of
Hi.
I am Iran Ali kia. I am a middle aged man.
I am a professional technician, I need a job permanently, thank you for
your cooperation.
در تاریخ سهشنبه ۲۱ فوریهٔ ۲۰۲۳، ۱۷:۲۳ Andreas Kolbe
نوشت:
> The Signpost – Volume 19, Issue 4 – 20 February 2023
> --
>
> News
Hoi,
Quote: "A significant minority of participants" so the majority is not what
Sign Post represents.. obviously.
Thanks,
GerardM
On Mon, 28 Nov 2022 at 17:33, Andreas Kolbe wrote:
> The Signpost – Volume 18, Issue 11 – 28 November 2022
> --
>
> News and notes:
