Kozuch,
Others have responded to many of your other points. I just wanted to
help with two things:
On 04/25/2012 02:49 PM, Jan Kučera wrote:
Hi,
yes, there surely were comments from developers... that is positive.
But the result as general is still nothing at all (the feature is not
even
Hi Oliver,
the development progress definitely is very very slow. As a
comparison, did you watch how the web front-end of Facebook changes
within the last year? It was completely overhauled about three
times... You may object Facebook is commercial and not comparable to
Wikimedia, but this
On Apr 29, 2012, at 1:04 AM, Jan Kučera wrote:
Hi Oliver,
the development progress definitely is very very slow. As a
comparison, did you watch how the web front-end of Facebook changes
within the last year? It was completely overhauled about three
times... You may object Facebook is
Jan; we get new features fairly regularly :). At the moment we're working
on two new pieces of software - the Article Feedback Form, v5, and New Page
Triage (a replacement for Special:NewPages). After that we're moving on to
a proper notifications system to allow better communication and
Sumana writes:
so if you could help me in alerting the extension's author to those
comments, that would be great. Thanks!
Jan Kučera writes:
yes, there surely were comments from developers... that is positive.
But the result as general is still nothing at all (the feature is not
even
Hi,
yes, there surely were comments from developers... that is positive.
But the result as general is still nothing at all (the feature is not
even nearing deployment). WMF should invest in new features. I am not
a dev and thus can not contribute any code.
Kozuch
2012/4/25 Sumana Harihareswara
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 18:41, Jan Kučera kozuc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
how do we want to work on editor retention if we lack social features at
all???
These go in the right direction:
http://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposal:Improving_our_platform
hi,
Please do thank the journalist concerned. I agree with the line of
reasoning.But I sway away from one of his conclusions.
So I think the answer is that Wikipedia needs to be more social. It needs a
different kind of moderation. And it needs more mechanisms for positive
feedback.
Tom, has a reputable news source actually verified this? Even Wikipedia
editors know that HuffPost isn't reliable...
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Tom Morris t...@tommorris.org wrote:
On 16 April 2012 18:41, Jan Kučera kozuc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
how do we want to work on
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 16:44:48 +0100, Thomas Morton wrote:
Whether they also want to
socialise with other editors is somewhat a secondary
consideration/distraction.
I disagree. A lot.
Of course that is your prerogative.
But I think in holding that view you've critically lost sight of the
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Thomas Morton
morton.tho...@googlemail.com wrote:
But perhaps it would be useful to suggest some specific social features
that you'd want - that might help focus the discussion.
I'm not sure that it makes sense to talk about adding social features in
the
11 matches
Mail list logo
