[Wikimedia-l] Qrpedia domain transfer

2013-12-20 Thread Katherine Bavage
Dear all, In January it was announced that Wikimedia UK had reached an agreement with Roger Bamkin and Terence Eden to accept the donation of the intellectual property rights of QRpedia to Wikimedia UK. WMUK are choosing to do this via a company called Cultural Outreach limited. This will mean

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Qrpedia domain transfer

2013-12-20 Thread Nathan
Thanks Katherine, I just have a couple of questions if you have a moment... 1) Why did WMUK choose to incorporate a new company to host the qrpedia IP? 2) Who are the officers / trustees of Cultural Outreach Ltd and how are they chosen? 3) Are there already or will there need to be cross

[Wikimedia-l] Fwd: [GLAM-US] Position: Wikipedia Affiliate, Roy Rosenzweig Center for History and New Media

2013-12-20 Thread Kevin Gorman
Hi all - George Mason University just posted a one year position for a remote Wikipedia Affiliate. It's unpaid, but that's not the point: if selected, you'll have full access to GMU's library resources, including access (via proxy) to their electronic journals. There's a huge amount of

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Qrpedia domain transfer

2013-12-20 Thread Andy Mabbett
On 20 December 2013 18:45, Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote: 2) Who are the officers / trustees of Cultural Outreach Ltd and how are they chosen? See https://wikimedia.org.uk/wiki/Cultural_Outreach_Limited -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk

[Wikimedia-l] The Old Wikipedia logo is still widely used - what can we do?

2013-12-20 Thread Amir E. Aharoni
Hallo. The old version of the puzzle globe Wikipedia logo was retired in 2010. It had wrongly painted letters in several languages as well as some graphical imperfections. The current logo has correct letters and improved vector graphics quality. Despite the replacement having taken place almost

[Wikimedia-l] (no subject)

2013-12-20 Thread Andy Mabbett
Here's an interesting article: Rapunzel and the Ivory Tower: How Open Access Will Save the Humanities (from Themselves) http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1302.2013.865977 in which Wikipedia is discussed. -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk

Re: [Wikimedia-l] The Old Wikipedia logo is still widely used - what can we do?

2013-12-20 Thread K. Peachey
Most news agencies don't just go to the web for their images due to copyright reasons. They will have a media collection system that they have the logo stored in. So the best response would be for the Media Relations/Comms teams to actually contact them and request they use the updated logo.

Re: [Wikimedia-l] The Old Wikipedia logo is still widely used - what can we do?

2013-12-20 Thread Federico Leva (Nemo)
Well, one thing we did was actually retiring the old logo, just few months ago. :) Odder provided no less than 108 Wikipedias with a v2 logo. http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikipedia-l/2013-May/031550.html Nemo ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list

Re: [Wikimedia-l] The Old Wikipedia logo is still widely used - what can we do?

2013-12-20 Thread Asaf Bartov
On Dec 20, 2013 1:58 PM, K. Peachey p858sn...@gmail.com wrote: Most news agencies don't just go to the web for their images due to copyright reasons. They will have a media collection system that they have the logo stored in. That is no doubt true for major media corporations, but a lot of

Re: [Wikimedia-l] The Old Wikipedia logo is still widely used - what can we do?

2013-12-20 Thread Svip
On 20 December 2013 22:02, Amir E. Aharoni amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il wrote: Can we do anything about it? My SEO skills are about non-existent. A Facebook friend suggested changing the title of the Commons file File:Wikipedia-logo.png to File:Wikipedia-logo-v1.png and

Re: [Wikimedia-l] The Old Wikipedia logo is still widely used - what can we do?

2013-12-20 Thread Federico Leva (Nemo)
Svip, 20/12/2013 23:27: Looking at the Google results, the first two are from Wikipedia (and these are the old logo), but from the articles [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia logos]] and [[Logo of Wikipedia]]. Both of which still includes the old logo. I think the article(s) in question might be key to