On 10/06/17 15:38, David Gerard wrote:
> Rather than me reading through several pages to pick out what you might
> mean, could you please quote the bits you consider particularly make a
> relevant point?
>
>
> - d.
Well, here is the abstract.
Gordon
*
AB
Apposite, but defective in a number of respects; also, explicitly advocacy
for Tor editing without really addressing the objections to it (that it's
99+% a firehose of garbage).
Rather than me reading through several pages to pick out what you might
mean, could you please quote the bits you consid
Hi,
I have found now this paper that seems relevant to this conversation:
Forte, Andrea, Nazanin Andalibi, and Rachel Greenstadt
"Privacy, anonymity, and perceived risk in open collaboration: a study
of Tor users and Wikipedians."
Proceedings of Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Comp
