*Books & Bytes – Issue 33, March – April 2019*
Highlights:
- #1Lib1Ref
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- Global branches update
- Bytes in brief
Read the full newsletter at
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/The_Wikipedia_Library/Newsletter/March-April_2019
Do you think it might be a common misconception, perhaps?
On May 20, 2019, at 6:39 AM, Paulo Santos Perneta
wrote:
> The idea that NC is "open and free" is growing like a cancer in Brazil and
> Portugal. I've been noticing that for some time already, and I do believe
> we as a Movement sho
Hi MarioGom,
Thanks for outlining these concerns. The Legal Team is currently looking into
the issue and has reached out to SurveyMonkey for additional information. I
will provide an update here when the matter is resolved.
Best,
Elena
--
Elena Lappen (she/her)
Community Relations Specialist
The idea that NC is "open and free" is growing like a cancer in Brazil and
Portugal. I've been noticing that for some time already, and I do believe
we as a Movement should have some sort of plan or strategy to fight that -
and never indulge in accepting NC as a valid license for the Wikimedia
proj
Where would it fit in Strategy 2030? Advocacy?
Paulo
James Heilman escreveu no dia segunda, 20/05/2019 à(s)
05:41:
> We all agree NC licenses are poor. The WMF position was a reflection of the
> community's position at the time and this likely remains the community's
> position today.
>
> If we