On Aug 23, 2012, at 8:05 AM, Anthony wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:49 PM, wrote:
>> To reword what I said before the vast majority of X-ray images in existence
>> are diagnostic
>> images. There is no reason at all to purposefully search out X-rays that
>> might land in some
>> grey
On Aug 23, 2012, at 7:35 AM, Anthony wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 8:20 AM, wrote:
>> Snip
>
And even if it is only the US, other countries would not recognize
copyright on diagnostic
images created in the US, which gives us at least the NASA situation.
>>>
>>> Do you h
Alice Wiegand, 23/08/2012 23:55:
And here's a very short note about the next steps:
The board is reviewing the RfC and its talk page over the next week.
We are going to share our thoughts with you soon on the RfC's talk
page. Please feel free to leave comments there, that's still possible
and wil
And here's a very short note about the next steps:
The board is reviewing the RfC and its talk page over the next week.
We are going to share our thoughts with you soon on the RfC's talk
page. Please feel free to leave comments there, that's still possible
and will be read ;-)
Regards, Alice
On
This is a question best referred to the RC church. Stranger phenomena
have been advanced for canonization :-)
On 8/23/2012 6:39 AM, wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org wrote:
Hmm...you may be right on that. If I accidentally spill some paint on
a canvas and it creates an image that looks l
On 23 August 2012 14:56, James Heilman wrote:
> Most of the issues where addressed. And they only way to determine if many
> of the concerns hold water is to simply try it. A travel guide will likely
> be heavily read and edited.
>
> As a comparison their are an approximately an equal number of m
Most of the issues where addressed. And they only way to determine if many
of the concerns hold water is to simply try it. A travel guide will likely
be heavily read and edited.
As a comparison their are an approximately an equal number of medical
articles on Wikipedia to travel articles. Yet the
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Anthony wrote:
> And many others were designed, like the X-ray image, to objectively
> depict reality.
In fact, in theory, almost all the images in an encyclopedia should be
of this type (I say "almost" because there will also be images which
are there for the pur
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:49 PM, wrote:
> To reword what I said before the vast majority of X-ray images in existence
> are diagnostic
> images. There is no reason at all to purposefully search out X-rays that
> might land in some
> grey area.
One problem with that is that the X-ray images tha
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 8:34 AM, wrote:
> On Aug 22, 2012, at 4:41 PM, Anthony wrote:
>> I could be wrong, but I'm not sure there's a requirement for aesthetic
>> or artistic purpose. Non-fiction, software, legal contracts, etc.,
>> all have been held to be copyrightable.
>
> I think you are ov
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 8:20 AM, wrote:
> I believe artistic/non-artistic is accurate for images. Technically it is
> artistic, literary, dramatic,
> or musical works.
Well, I think that's an abuse of the term "artistic". The job of a
photojournalist, for instance, is to capture what is true,
On Aug 22, 2012, at 4:41 PM, Anthony wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Todd Allen wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Anthony wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Thomas Dalton
>>> wrote:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Upperarm.jpg
>>>
>>> http://common
On Aug 22, 2012, at 9:22 AM, Anthony wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 9:14 AM, wrote:
>> I really doubt non-artistic works are copyrighted as a general rule anywhere
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by "non-artistic", but if you mean "purely
> utilitarian", as that term is interpreted by the
On Aug 22, 2012, at 9:31 AM, Anthony wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Anthony wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 9:14 AM, wrote:
>>> Now clearly being able to judge that X is a utilitarian work is the more
>>> normal problem with
>>> this argument and why it is seldom used. Diagn
I see none of the issues raised were really addressed.
Another spam filled, little populated, project then.
*sigh*
Tom
On 23 August 2012 11:53, Andrew Gray wrote:
> On 22 August 2012 22:39, Kim Bruning wrote:
> > For those interested, a quick reminder:
> >
> > The travel guide RFC will (soft
On 22 August 2012 22:39, Kim Bruning wrote:
> For those interested, a quick reminder:
>
> The travel guide RFC will (soft) close in 1 hour, 17 minutes as of the
> moment this mail is sent. (At 0:00, 23 August 2012 (UTC))
>
> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Travel_Guide
16 matches
Mail list logo
