On 13.01.2014 23:57, Risker wrote:
I dunno, guys. I certainly would take a talk page message over a
mechanical thank any day of the week. More particularly, I notice a
significant trend in using thank notifications to express agreement
with
people without having to actually say yeah, I agree
On 14 January 2014 14:42, Yaroslav M. Blanter pute...@mccme.ru wrote:
What does indeed make a difference and creates a sense of human interaction
is custom messaging over templated messaging.
It's the human interaction bit. I was *delighted* when I got a thank
you for an edit, and really
On 14.01.2014 15:53, David Gerard wrote:
On 14 January 2014 14:42, Yaroslav M. Blanter pute...@mccme.ru
wrote:
What does indeed make a difference and creates a sense of human
interaction
is custom messaging over templated messaging.
It's the human interaction bit. I was *delighted* when I
On 13 January 2014 20:32, Philippe Beaudette pbeaude...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
On Jan 13, 2014, at 4:18 PM, Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org wrote:
we're getting almost 3,000 thanks
actions a day, every day
It would be interesting to know if that impacted the number of
barnstars
Barnstars mostly use a set of templates, right? (At least, the 80% case).
We could ballpark it fairly effectively by checking for that set, no?
pb
*Philippe Beaudette * \\ Director, Community Advocacy \\ Wikimedia
Foundation, Inc.
T: 1-415-839-6885 x6643 | phili...@wikimedia.org | :
Dear Gerard,
Thank you so much for your kind words about the proposed Multimedia Vision for
Wikimedia sites by 2016. (1)
I am glad that our first user stories resonate with you. They intentionally
focus on ways that our community may interact through multimedia -- and we view
these types of
Yes, but what you'd then have to do is either go through the database dumps
or hit the API and check individual diffs. Database-stored information on
templates is where are those templates linked from, not and when were
those links added (unless something has changed relatively recently)
On 14
On 01/14/2014 02:18 PM, Oliver Keyes wrote:
Database-stored information on
templates is where are those templates linked from, not and when were
those links added (unless something has changed relatively recently)
And even then that'd give dubious results. Some talk page get archived
There is inherent humour in being unable to test the comparative efficacy
of a technological whizbang due to the lack of sufficiently standardised
technological whizbangs ;p.
On 14 January 2014 11:32, Marc A. Pelletier m...@uberbox.org wrote:
On 01/14/2014 02:18 PM, Oliver Keyes wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Marc A. Pelletier m...@uberbox.orgwrote:
Add to this the complexity that several barnstars are subst:ed rather
than transcluded -- but not all -- and you end up with a completely
intractable problem.
Bah humbug.
*Philippe Beaudette * \\ Director,
Oliver Keyes, 14/01/2014 20:36:
There is inherent humour in being unable to test the comparative efficacy
of a technological whizbang due to the lack of sufficiently standardised
technological whizbangs ;p.
I'd rather call is a systemic bias which makes us favor standardised
technological
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Philippe Beaudette
phili...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Marc A. Pelletier m...@uberbox.orgwrote:
Add to this the complexity that several barnstars are subst:ed rather
than transcluded -- but not all -- and you end up with a
So you'd rather measure effectiveness through...the feeling in your water?
On 14 January 2014 12:29, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com wrote:
Oliver Keyes, 14/01/2014 20:36:
There is inherent humour in being unable to test the comparative efficacy
of a technological whizbang due to
On 14 January 2014 21:20, Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On 14 January 2014 12:29, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd rather call is a systemic bias which makes us favor standardised
technological whizbangs just because we can measure them rather than for an
actual
Aha. I totally agree with that, then, but I don't think it's the motivation
for this feature.
On 14 January 2014 13:28, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 January 2014 21:20, Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On 14 January 2014 12:29, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com
On 01/14/2014 04:07 PM, Tilman Bayer wrote:
but I wouldn't rule out
the possibility that they still achieved a good approximation.
I'd wager that what they have gotten might be a poor sample; there is
certainly a correlation between being a power/advanced user and more
intricate talk page
16 matches
Mail list logo
