>
>
> Rogol, there are some interesting ideas in this model, and perhaps useful
> language to prompt discussion, but you cannot fit a societal model to a
> modest sized organization.
>
> Your conclusion would rely on the WMF (or indeed the Community of
> Wikimedians) having an inexhaustible supply
Forwarding to Legal. I'm aware of the general problem of undisclosed COI
editing, and agree that there should be some enforcement of this,
particularly given that WMF wants to use Wikipedia's NPOV and RS policies
as part of WMF's marketing. I also wonder if WMF might be able to recover
the costs of
Rogol, there are some interesting ideas in this model, and perhaps useful
language to prompt discussion, but you cannot fit a societal model to a
modest sized organization.
Your conclusion would rely on the WMF (or indeed the Community of
Wikimedians) having an inexhaustible supply of politicians
I am interested to learn if WMF management or the board has discussed
taking legal action against companies that offer services to edit Wikipedia
and that have no on-Wiki presence disclosing their edits (in en-WP at
least) per the Terms of Use. We all know the companies and their websites,
where t
